Jump to content

User talk:Adamsanels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ahmed Girri Bin Hussein Al Somali, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 17:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added multiple sources though. What more is needed? Adamsanels (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you sprinkled citations superficially to justify removing the templates. And you obviously didn't address the original research issue, despite trying to remove the template. Have you edited Wikipedia before? R Prazeres (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve added extensive sources in addition to the original research that was already there i.e. the futuh itself. Richard Burton and Marcus Harold for example, highly reliable. The article had some spelling and grammar mistakes that fixed aswell. Adamsanels (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't answer my question: have you edited Wikipedia before? R Prazeres (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A few years back yes I have, not in a long time though. Adamsanels (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whats wrong? Why can’t I remove the templates? Adamsanels (talk) 20:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added the 5-6 sources on the 18th and I also referenced Richard Burton today. Adamsanels (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ahmed Girri Bin Hussein Al Somali. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the 5-6 sources on the 18th and I also referenced Richard Burton today. When can I remove the templates? Adamsanels (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't remove them, period. You know there is no consensus to do so, so stop lobbying to remove them. The task of fixing the article and of removing the templates will likely fall to other, more experienced editors. R Prazeres (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The info is straight forward on the page though. There is no contradiction at all. How many other sources is enough? Adamsanels (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Who do I need a consensus from? Only you? Adamsanels (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that you don't understand what the maintenance templates are for is further indication that you shouldn't be removing them. Among other things, you don't seem to understand what WP:OR means, so I suggest you read it carefully and look at why the template was added ([1]). Per WP:CONSENSUS and WP:BRD], it's your responsibility to edit by consensus; that means with anyone in general, not just me. R Prazeres (talk) 21:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay but can you explain which of the sources are considered OR so I can strengthen the article? Adamsanels (talk) 22:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Adamsanels, please read Wikipedia:No original research. Sources cannot be OR (original research), only the way you handle sources can be. To simplify, anything that is based on an interpretation or analysis of primary sources by a Wikipedia editor, but that one cannot find explicitly written in an independent, secondary source, is considered 'original research'. The easiest way to avoid OR is to not use primary sources at all and to find reliable secondary sources instead. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic notice: Horn of Africa[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Bennyblanco10 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennyblanco10. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adamsanels&oldid=1197989957"