User talk:Adriem913

Welcome!

Hello, Adriem913, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Abishe (talk) 00:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve FotoSketcher

Hello, Adriem913,

Thank you for creating FotoSketcher.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

IMO the notability (see WP:NPRODUCT, the guideline for products) is borderline. The article has two refs that are independent, secondary, significant, and probably reliable (they are listed so per WP:VG/RS, apologies that I could only find the video game reliable sources list). If we could find one more in-depth ref (possibly another review), which I didn't find per my WP:BEFORE, I'll remove the notability tag.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FotoSketcher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FotoSketcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FotoSketcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FotoSketcher

Hello, Adriem913. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FotoSketcher".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:FotoSketcher has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FotoSketcher. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FotoSketcher (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FotoSketcher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adriem913! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]