User talk:Adrigon

Welcome!

Hello, Adrigon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Chamorro Scouting

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Chamorro? Thanks! Chris 03:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Swordswoman of Huangjiaing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swordswoman of Huangjiaing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on My Mother the Car

The reason the revert was labeled vandalism is that the author of the edits is a banned user and the edits were done in defiance of an indefinite block. The editor is a persistent and frequent vandal, and to date has created over 35 sockpuppet accounts for the purpose of vandalism. His edits are now being reverted regardless of merit. Please examine the notice on his talk page and you'll see why the edit was reverted as vandalism. He has long since used up his assumption of good faith. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scanners (musical group)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Scanners (musical group), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chen zhi gong in Swordswoman of Huangjiang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chen zhi gong in Swordswoman of Huangjiang.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Baolintemple.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Baolintemple.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SapsareePuppy1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SapsareePuppy1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Jacoulet - Jeune Fille De Saipan Et Fleurs D'Hibiscus, Marianes 1934.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jacoulet - Jeune Fille De Saipan Et Fleurs D'Hibiscus, Marianes 1934.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC) --Ricky81682 (talk) 06:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit problem at Zevia

As you did on 30 October 2008, would you be so kind as to revert the Zevia page to your last edit? Since that time, the SPA using Wikipedia for an attack mission has edited again. This user has a history of and has been warned against improperly altering content (please see User_talk:Openthedoorfornow). I have placed a warning to this user regarding the Zevia activity on the Zevia talk page. Thank you very much. Seattle Michael (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manifest Destiny

Hello Adrigon. I agree that the concept had religious influences, but believe that it is too restictive to limit those influences to Christianity. I have posted some comments on the talk page of this article. Could you visit there and discuss, so we can arrive at a consensus? Thank you. Kablammo (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I will work up a revision to see if our mutual concerns can be satisfied. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Ericsson Idou, S60?

And which sources would they be?

As for my counter-argument, please refer to this discussion page.

I'll leave it to you to change it back. Joshuaali (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gu Gu

Oops, my mistake. DS (talk) 19:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Greetings Adrigon, would you be so kind to help me create an article about Confucius in Chamorro Wikipedia? Please. It's about a Chinese philosopher and is listed as one of the articles every Wikipedia should have. If you think that article is too long, here is a short version: "Confucius was a Chinese thinker and social philosopher, whose teachings and philosophy have deeply influenced Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese thought and life. His philosophy emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity." I hope, you could help. Thanks a lot, and best regards:)--Amaqqut (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kamilia Wawrzynia

I have nominated Kamilia Wawrzynia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamilia Wawrzynia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 03:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT politicians

Category:LGBT politicians is never applied directly to an individual person; it's only a container for more specific subcategories. If you have a validly sourced reason to switch Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir's category from "lesbian" to "bisexual", that would be okay; if you are aware of enough additional articles to create Category:LGBT politicians from Iceland instead, that would be okay too. But switching her from "lesbian" to "LGBT" isn't appropriate, because the "LGBT" parent category isn't supposed to have anybody directly in it at all. Bearcat (talk) 22:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stray dogs in Moscow

On May 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stray dogs in Moscow, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zevia

The article Zevia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable product. Fails WP:N and WP:CORP. The references provided give only trivial mention to this product, failing WP:SIGCOV.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Oz, The Great and Powerful

I have nominated Oz, The Great and Powerful, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oz, The Great and Powerful. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mike Allen 06:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Lindsay Lohan. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was in no way, shape or form, "libelous". I will revert your reversion of my edit to the article, with and add a citation.Adrigon (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing a source. Without a source, it could be libelous. But even if it wasn't, we have an important little policy on Wikipedia called verifiability. You've been around long enough to know that. Cresix (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Chen zhi gong in Swordswoman of Huangjiang.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chen zhi gong in Swordswoman of Huangjiang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Stray dogs in Moscow

An anonymous IP wants the Malchik section removed because of "animal rights bias" or some such stuff. The info seems relevant to me, though this isn't my usual topic area. I've reverted him a couple of times but now that he's taken to the talk page I thought it might be best if you dealt with this yourself, being the original author of the article. Thanks, Lithoderm 02:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DFS Galleria

I have cleared the history of DFS Galleria, allowing you to move DFS (Pacific retailer) over it. I did restore the most recent recirect version, which shouldn't interfere with the page move. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Adrigon (talk) 07:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 21 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article UDFy-38135539, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Mkativerata (talk) 20:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Georg Broe - The Rivals 1968.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Georg Broe - The Rivals 1968.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Georg Broe - The Rivals 1968.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Georg Broe - The Rivals 1968.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xerxes (film)

The article Xerxes (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFF; Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mein Weg auf die Laufstege der Welt von Irina Pantaeva.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mein Weg auf die Laufstege der Welt von Irina Pantaeva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul City Sue Infobox

You recently removed the place and cause of death from the Seoul City Sue infobox with the note "these are unreferenced and aren't explained in the article". They were referred to in the "Later Life" section, and cited by footnote #51. If the citation seems insufficient, what is your objection? Cmholm (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reference says he "heard" she was "shot". The reference doesn't specify that she was actually executed by firing squad, but the infobox nevertheless proclaimed that she died in such a manner. And what it does say about her possible death was admittedly hearsay, rather than conclusive. Therefore, the cause of her death is inconclusive. Yet it was included in the infobox as though it were fact.
"North Korea" was apparently just an assumption, because the location given for her supposed killing was not specified.

Being from a book rather than a web source, the citation's details are not readily available for further investigation.Adrigon (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rocksmith Edits

The Oct 16, 2012 release is for the PC VERSION. The software itself (for XBox and PS3) was released Oct 18, 2011. That's how thousands of us have been playing it for over 6 months. . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikerrr (talk • contribs) 20:09, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably, you only read my edit summary line and not the content of the actual edit.Adrigon (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC) That is correct. Disregard comment about PC release date! I was thinking about the review date that I added which someone kept insisting on deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikerrr (talk • contribs) 16:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Jacoulet selfportrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jacoulet selfportrait.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Chamorro people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topknot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese speaker needed for DR on Commons

Hi. I came to your page because I'm looking for a Chinese speaker who can help out with a deletion request on Commons. commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penile curvature-TW.jpg is about several images a user uploaded of annotated penis diagrams, with a UNESCO logo in the bottom right. The user seems to want to try and correct their mistake, but they're not a native english speaker and are using google translate to speak to us, which isn't optimal. We were hoping a native Chinese speaker might be able to sort things out for us.

Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nager acrofacial dysostosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tragus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Buckingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carolinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birth categories.

Please stop adding birth categories more refined than the year. These are depreciated and are in fact merged/deleted to the year, including some just recently. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:4 August 1978 births

Category:4 August 1978 births, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haplogroup B (mtDNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malagasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Latte stones 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Latte stones 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latte stones 2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Latte stones 2.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Staxx

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Staxx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wildthing61476 (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Facebook real-name policy controversy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oglala and Lakota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Facebook real-name policy controversy page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Melina Mercouri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 22:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Steve McQueen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 22:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the names listed on the page List of dropouts, which have attached sources. As far as I know, sources aren't/can't be attached to category wikilinks.Adrigon (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such requirement for categories. But the main article should mention that the subject dropped out of high school. The list you mentioned lists The Celebrity Almanac, (c) 1991, by Ed Lucaire as one of the references. I am not sure if that is a reliable source. Also for Melina Mercouri for example, her article does not mention anything about her dropping out of school. The article for Roger Mooore mentions that he went to college and nothing about dropping out of high school. Making mass changes this way and so fast can lead to many inaccuracies imo. Dr. K. 22:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty School Drop Outs?

Hi there. You know, don't you, that we don't have something called "High School" in the UK? But notwithstanding the inappropriateness of that particular category name, including both Starkey and Woodward in such a category somewhat blurs the real reason for their premature absence from secondary school, which can be explained in a different way? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC) p.s. I know Wikipedia Categories can be a thing of beauty, but I think you may have to drop this one for a while. Thanks. [reply]

*As mentioned in the reply above, I am using the names listed on the page List of dropouts. I didn't create or (re)name the category. But if the name is erroneous in the context of the UK educational system, and you furthermore feel it has unflattering connotations which are unacceptable when associated with certain article subjects/people, I recommend renaming the category, perhaps to something like "people who didn't complete secondary education [for whatever reason]".Adrigon (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has long since decided that categorising people as high school dropouts is inappropriate (see here), and the category will soon be emptied speedily deleted as the recreation of previously deleted content. Please don't categorise people in this way, or in similar ways. Thanks, Bencherlite ^Talk 22:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent suggestion. Let's wait for it to be renamed then, shall we? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A very helpful comment by Bencherlite. Thank you. Dr. K. 22:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify my intent in having added this category to the articles of those whose names were listed: Most of the people to whom it applies are exceptional achievers despite not having acquired a high school (or equivalent) diploma, something that society commonly views as a basic prerequisite for success in life. The simple categorization of these achievers as "dropouts" therefore goes against the idea of the term "dropouts" as being synonymous with "losers". I posit that this category acknowledging that part of their lives is worthwhile and no less worthy of inclusion than many other categories on Wikipedia. It may not be a defining characteristic, but that doesn't mean it's not a relevant one.

Adding this category isn't intended as "mud slinging" (a term used by someone in favor of deleting a previous incarnation of the category, in the 2-person vote linked above). On the contrary.Adrigon (talk) 23:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mud slinging?! I'm sure that's the last thing we want. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DFS Galleria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DFS Galleria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 09:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adrigon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

You've been around long enough to know that stuff like this requires a citation to a reliable source. Bright☀ 23:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaeyaena Beuraheng for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaeyaena Beuraheng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaeyaena Beuraheng until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Adrigon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wylye (disambiguation)

The article Wylye (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DAB page not needed per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chamoru Wikipedia

Hi! How are you? I've seen that you speak Chamoru and I would like to ask you whether you could help out at the Chamoru Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 10:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]