User talk:Afshaaan.ahmed

Aneeqa Bashir moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aneeqa Bashir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Aneeqa Bashir, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thilsebatti,

Thank you for your feedback regarding the Aneeqa Bashir article. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining Wikipedia's content quality.

I'd like to clarify that I do not have any personal or professional relationship with Aneeqa Bashir. My intention in creating this article was to highlight the environmental efforts of an individual whose work I found noteworthy. I understand and respect Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest and have endeavored to contribute in an unbiased manner.

Regarding the additional sources needed to establish notability, I have utilized credible sources like Dawn, The News International, and Geo News. If there are specific types of sources or particular information you believe would enhance the article's notability and reliability, I would be grateful for your suggestions.

I acknowledge the concerns about language and grammatical issues in the article and will focus on improving these aspects. As a relatively new Wikipedia contributor, I am keen to learn and adhere to the platform's content policies. Any guidance or advice you can provide to help me refine the draft would be greatly appreciated.

Looking forward to your suggestions and further advice. Afshaaan.ahmed (talk) 05:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not have any personal or professional relationship, how were you able to take a picture of her earlier this month? —C.Fred (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for raising your concern. I want to clarify that the photo of Aneeqa Bashir used in the article wasn’t personally taken by me. It was sourced from publicly available images, similar to those found in a Google Images search. I’m dedicated to complying with Wikipedia’s guidelines and have no personal or professional relationship with the subject. My aim is to contribute constructively based on verifiable and publicly accessible information.

If there are specific aspects of the article that need improvement, I'm open to feedback and willing to make necessary changes. Afshaaan.ahmed (talk) 05:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in to see if you had a chance to look over my last message about the Aneeqa Bashir article. I explained about the photo and how it was sourced. I'm really trying to make sure everything in the article is up to Wikipedia standards and would love any advice or feedback you have.

Thanks for helping out, I'm still learning the ropes here.

Cheers, Afshaaan.ahmed (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aneeqa Bashir (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aneeqa Bashir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 08:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 08:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmad Rafay Alam (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:PRIMARY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qcne,

Thanks for reviewing the draft for Ahmad Rafay Alam. I see your point about needing more coverage from independent sources.

Could you maybe point me to a few examples of similar Pakistani profiles on Wikipedia? It'd help me understand what kind of sources I should be looking for. Alam's got quite a bit of coverage in big newspapers and journals, both in Pakistan and internationally, so I thought that might be enough, but I get that Wikipedia has its own way of doing things.

Any tips or examples you can share would be super helpful. I want to make sure I get this right.

Thanks a bunch for your help! Afshaaan.ahmed (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aneeqa Bashir (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aneeqa Bashir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam

Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ahmad Rafay Alam

I have moved the article back to draft space, as it has not been improved since it was last refused at WP:Articles for creation. Please do not return it to mainspace. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aneeqa Bashir

Hello, Afshaaan.ahmed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aneeqa Bashir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]