User talk:Agentogden-mcla
Agentogden-mcla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe the admin that set the block is abusing power. The block was set because the admin disagreed with the information that was being changed on an article about a subject that I have been close to for 15 years. My knowledge of the subject in question far exceededs that of the admin making the block. I have contributed to many Wiki pages without issues. In this instance it is simply an admin who doesn't want what he wrote changed, even though it is 100% incorrect. If those with power can just block other contributors for no reason how does Wiki continue to provide users with not only information but correct information?
Decline reason:
You are blocked for abuse of multiple accounts - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dollallama/Archive. You will have to address that if you want to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Agentogden-mcla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I only have 1 account. I don't know what this multiple account block is all about. Please unblock my account so I can contribute. I am the webmaster for many bands including Primus, Les Claypool and associated acts. I was asked to make a change to Claypool's wiki page and I was then labeled a sock puppet. I only use my own account and have contributed to several wiki pages.
Decline reason:
A checkuser has confirmed that these accounts are related based on technical evidence. Without addressing this - we will be unable to unblock you. SQLQuery me! 02:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Agentogden-mcla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know what "related" means. Do I know others who work with Primus? of Course. I'm really confused as to why this has happened and absolutely no idea how to resolve it. This seems really extreme. Can someone please give some clear answer on how to resolve this?
Decline reason:
When multiple persons working for Primus band together to push through the same content, that's violating Wikipedia's policies. I rather doubt it's a coincidence that you and User:Officialprimus were making the same edits within days when your account had been dormant for about a year or so before. Huon (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Agentogden-mcla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It all seems pretty extreme. So wiki pages can never change if those select few moderators don't agree with the info? Seems to defeat the purpose. If I am an expert mathematician, with 17 PhD's in math, and I have proof that 1+1 is 2, but the all mighty wiki moderators say it is 3, then 3 stands. Not only that, I'm not allowed to own a calculator as a result of it. Power over substance is not really a good strategy for a source of information. Is this Fox News? You can think what you want, but my account is separate from primusofficial. My account has the -mcla user name which references a sports league that I started. it has nothing to do with Primus. My article contributions go back to 2005 when I started the TV channel Palladia (now MTV live). No one is offering any information on how to resolve this issue. There was no banding together. Information needed changed, people tried to change it. I'm pretty sure there are much bigger issues than a couple people trying to get some Primus information cleared up.
Decline reason:
I have reviewed the article, it is clear that several users where coordinating to edit war on the page and that you participated. See the pattern: [1][2][3][4].
Given how long this was ago I would recommend considering the standard offer. Keep in mind that the standard offer is generally only accepted by the community when they are convinced the prior behaviour will not repeat. This generally means taking responsibility for that behaviour and explaining what has changed since then. If you make another unblock request I suggest you keep that in mind. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 03:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.