User talk:Agon Kraovov

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Kraovov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An admin deleted content from my user page and then blocked me. I'm not sure what I did wrong? Can someone please explain and possibly unblock? Was the photo I put in my user page offensive? It it was I'm sorry. Agon Kraovov (talk) 23:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked as a sock puppet of User:Zerki Karakiron. In your next unblock request, you should address this. PhilKnight (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bizarre edits to User Page[edit]

I see, I will look in to this. In the mean time, can User:Drmies tell me why they removed some content from my user page?

--I would also like to know why this user thought it necessary to leave offensive comments in the edit summary when they removed content from my user page.

-- Licensing of removed content.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

If this is not legally possible:

I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

Oh, "size matters"? There was no parameter setting a size for the image, so it took up three or four full screens, as seen [User:Agon Kraovov here]. But I'm glad it was free content--thanks for setting that straight. Drmies (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Can an admin please help me concerning the problem listed at User talk:Agon Kraovov#Bizarre edits to User Page As to why I am not taking this up with the offending administrator is because I cannot contact them because they blocked me.

Agon Kraovov (talk) 01:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Kraovov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do have another account which I forgot the password of, however I request that I be unblocked because my edits were not abusive/destructive on either account I used. The reason for my block seems to be having multiple accounts, however this in and of its self is not officially a blockable offense. Agon Kraovov (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Kraovov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please bear with me that I am using this appeal again, however I do not believe the problem has been handled properly as of yet. The behavior for which I was apparently blocked does not meet the criteria of innapropriate uses of alternate accounts.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but this block was initiated by a CheckUser following evidence that verified the Wikipedia policy violations that you were reported for. You must appeal your block to the Arbitration Committee. Instructions are here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note I've performed a check to confirm what Drmies found and this account is a Confirmed sockpuppet. As you need to appeal the block from your main (original) account I have removed access to this account's talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]