User talk:Agon Mustafa

Agon Mustafa, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Agon Mustafa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Vacant0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Orahovac have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.--Vacant0 (talk) 09:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Aleenf1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of UEFA Champions League broadcasters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aleen f1 07:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aleenf1

I want to say that, I know who will broadcast this in my country(Kosovo), if you don't know that, you don't have to undo my edit

The companys that will broadcast three league (UCL, UEL, UECL) in Kosovo are ArtMotion and Kujtesa. The source for ArtMotion is in the page but for Kujtesa I will send you.

Here is the link: https://www.instagram.com/p/CQQxd9xLPKm/

Thank You. Agon Mustafa 01:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Agon Mustafa (talk) 23:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever read Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and please do not always said you are fix "typo", there no typo for you to fix. --Aleen f1 22:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did You check if it is a fake or a real source?(The instagram link) Agon Mustafa (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See your stubborn, Instagram not accepted as sources. --Aleen f1 06:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:UGC if you couldn't get it, as is being awhile you failed to learn it. As please civilly follow the guidelines of editing here. --Aleen f1 06:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced with Kujtesa really have the rights, after i found some evidence in the last time they broadcast from Arena Sport consent, need to wait until UEFA publish a list, definitely they will publish, sorry. --Aleen f1 14:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kujtesa now isn't in partnership with ArenaSport(but they broadcast the ArenaSports channels) Kujtesa is in partnership with ArtMotion(which I think ArtMotion brought Kujtesa) Kujtesa will broadcast UCL UEL UECL through their sports channels(KSport) and through ArtMotion sports channels(ArtSport) and through ArenaSport.

I think UEFA won't publish a list or something else(because of partnership of Kujtesa with ArtMotion)

Thank You. Agon Mustafa (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you also failed to highlight is it sub-licensing or carriage deal. Only you think. --Aleen f1 00:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/InfomaniaRKS, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Aleen f1 11:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki[edit]

Please refrain from putting any interwiki links as of MOS:IWL! This is English Wikipedia, is any English speaking ever to understand when you link to foreign language of wiki? --Aleen f1 23:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Dr Salvus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Coppa Italia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr Salvus 17:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I forgot to add the source I will add right now. Thank You for telling me that. Agon Mustafa (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mitrovica, Kosovo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The city of Mitrovica is a part of Republic of Kosovo, and the name was a political name, that was the reasion I deleted it, and I didn't delete the name on serbian language only the political name which is totally wrong and unacceptable too.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring. We don't need an explanation as to why you were edit warring, we need assurances that you understand why you were blocked and that you won't repeat the behaviour. Please read WP:GAB before making additional appeals.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

K Sport moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, K Sport, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 12:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was preparing the source to add but you didn't wait and made it Draft, WTF ?! Are you stupid? Why you didn't ask me first? Agon Mustafa (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oversport[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oversport, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CentDog🐶 ( Woof • Dig ) 16:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Draft:K Sport, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 16:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at draft:K Sport, you may be blocked from editing. Maniik ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 16:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Game me a reason to put it on Draft ? Agon Mustafa (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give* Agon Mustafa (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is no way near being ready for a move to article space. Do not attempt to move it again until it has reached a stage where it can be approved at WP:AFC! Favonian (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oversport moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Oversport, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 17:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think the only reason i have been blocked is because you can block me not because I deserved it.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Vanjagenije:, not sure of you meant to do it, but you overrode 331dot's decline.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ponyo: I don't know what happened. Anyway, I think there's no need to revert it, there's already new request below. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made the change because I didn't saw the warning, due to internet slow and my phone was lagging, I have finished the resource and I'm waiting for Unblock to add them to te article

Decline reason:

This is a transparent lie. You saw the warning and responded to it here, and then did the move [1]. As a result of this, I have extended your block indefinitely. Yamla (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't give me a reason, you just re-put it on Draft.( and I didn't saw it on the second time) I have finished the rehaible resources and I'm ready to put them into the article. If not posible to remove the block, just please re-put it on 7 days block. Agon Mustafa (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You didn't give me a reason, you just re-put it on Draft.(and I didn't saw it on the second time(when you have me the reason)) I have finished the rehaible resources and I'm ready to put them into the article. If not posible to remove the block, just please re-put it on 7 days block. I also accept my mistake and I apologize for that.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have finished the rehaible resources and I'm ready to put them into the article. If not posible to remove the block, just please re-put it on 7 days block.

I also accept my mistake and I apologize for that.}} Agon Mustafa (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a re-move for an article(which I created it) from Draft which I got an warning but I didn't saw it a re do it again for only the second time, and i got a permanent block (first time i got 7 days block). I'm asking if possible to remove the block and start editing again, if not posible to remove the block totally, please set a 7 days block.

Thank You! I apologize for my mistake. I won't do it again. 'People learn from mistakes' (We are all humans here)

Decline reason:

Your block was lengthened to indefinite because of this lie. You'll need to address that; it's not a "mistake". --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a re-move for an article(which I created it) from Draft which I got an warning but I didn't saw it a re do it again for only the second time, and i got a permanent block.

I'm not asking for unblock, I'm just trying to get back the 7 days block(or 14 days), instead of indefinitive.

Thank You! I apologize for my mistake. I won't do it again. Agon Mustafa (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you are not asking to be unblocked, this is not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a re-move for an article(which I created it) from Draft which I got an warning but I didn't saw it a re do it again for only the second time, and i got a permanent block.

I'm asking for unblock, cus I want to start again and editing the Wikipedia (mostly Sports articles).

I accept my mistake. I apologize for my mistake. I won't do it again.

Thank You! Agon Mustafa (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're just repeating the same unblock request over and over with very minor changes, even though it was declined with the statement that you did see the warning, you replied to warning, and you continued moving the page despite the warning. If you wish to appeal this block, you will have to go through WP:UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Unblock the User Agon Mustafa[edit]

Hello Administrator, I'm requesting you to unblock the user Agon Mustafa as he made so many change to the English Wikipedia and Albanian Wikipedia. He mostly changes Sport article as you can see in his Contributions page. RKS EDITORS (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:K Sport[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:K Sport, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fade258 (talk) 08:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:K Sport[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:K Sport, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fade258 (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oversport[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oversport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ArtMotion[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ArtMotion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ArtSport[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ArtSport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oversport[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oversport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ArtMotion[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ArtMotion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ArtSport[edit]

Hello, Agon Mustafa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ArtSport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58901[edit]

is closed. Noted that Yamla saw not logged i editing in April UTRS appeal #57391. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #59377[edit]

is closed. Again. Please do not evade your block/edit logged out/create another account until after you are unblocked. Even after December 10, 2022. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom appeal - downgraded block[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved to downgrade the block on this account. It remains blocked because of its previous disruptive editing (which can be considered to include the disruptive editing included at the sockpuppet investigation). Any administrator may see fit to review an appeal accordingly. Izno (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the Wikipedia Administrators,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account, username: Agon Mustafa. I understand that my account was blocked due to continuous edits that I now realize were against Wikipedia guidelines, and the suspicion of creating multiple fake accounts.

First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere apologies for any disruption my actions may have caused within the Wikipedia community. It was never my intention to violate the rules, and I deeply regret my actions. I have since familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies to ensure such errors are not repeated.

Regarding the suspicion of creating multiple fake accounts, I want to clarify that I have only ever operated under the username "Agon Mustafa." I am committed to maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia platform and have no interest in participating in any fraudulent activities.

To prevent any future misunderstandings, I am dedicated to following Wikipedia's editing policies and guidelines diligently. I am more than willing to learn from my past mistakes and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.

I kindly request the reconsideration of the block on my account and the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to following Wikipedia's rules and contributing constructively. If necessary, I am open to any restrictions or mentorship as suggested by the administrators to ensure that I can become a responsible and valuable Wikipedia editor.

Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to a positive resolution to this matter.

Sincerely,

Agon Mustafa Agon Mustafa (talk) 10:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is quite obvious that an AI wrote this for you. We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words. 331dot (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I'm writing to request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, Agon Mustafa, which was blocked due to my past violation of editing guidelines and suspicions of creating fake accounts.

I apologize for any disruptions my previous actions may have caused. I want to clarify that I've only operated under the username Agon Mustafa.

Best regards, Agon Mustafa

Decline reason:

This isn't very convincing in light of the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Agon_Mustafa/Archive. Are you saying, for example, that Agon Mustafa 2 wasn't your account? If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to be honest about the events that led to your block and explain how you'll avoid such situations in the future. Spicy (talk) 15:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Agon Mustafa (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

{{unblock||Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal for the removal of the ban on my account. I acknowledge and sincerely apologize for violating Wikipedia rules. My actions were unintentional, and I deeply regret any disruption caused. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines, I am committed to strict adherence in the future. I value the integrity of the platform and am open to any necessary guidance or restrictions. I kindly request the reconsideration of the ban on my account. I am eager to demonstrate my commitment to following rules and contributing positively to the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Agon Mustafa}} [[User:Agon Mustafa|Agon Mustafa]] ([[User talk:Agon Mustafa#top|talk]]) 21:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock reason[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal for the removal of the ban on my account. I acknowledge and sincerely apologize for violating Wikipedia rules. My actions were unintentional, and I deeply regret any disruption caused. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's guidelines, I am committed to strict adherence in the future. I value the integrity of the platform and am open to any necessary guidance or restrictions. I kindly request the reconsideration of the ban on my account. I am eager to demonstrate my commitment to following rules and contributing positively to the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Agon Mustafa

Decline reason:

We have been trying to reach you about your unblock request, but you have not responded. Please WP:ping me or open a new unblock request indicating your acceptance of the Special:permalink/1195976126#Proposed unblock conditions Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No CU evidence of recent block evasion. This is a pretty terrible unblock request, though. I'll leave it to the next reviewing admin to decide how to respond. --Yamla (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion[edit]

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that all new article creations must be made as drafts and vetted by WP:AFC before being moved to article space. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I created some articles without making them as drafts, so of course it is against the Wikipedia rules.

I mostly edit articles that have to do with sports in Republic of Kosova, or something similar.

I will always check if my edits will be against the rules before posting them.

Note: About being sockpuppet I will say this again that i haven't created any account except "Agon Mustafa 2", but in my sockpuppet page it says that i have created 4 accounts which is not true. Agon Mustafa (talk) 08:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per UTRS appeal #49442, RKS EDITORS is a "friend." What is your relationship to MITRO BOYS? Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i can confirm he is my friend,

about MITROBOYS i have no idea who is he Agon Mustafa (talk) 12:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, if you are unblocked, you'll need to not coordinate edits with friends and people you do not know. Doing so is a form of wp:sock puppetry. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were reverted for unsourced and poorly sourced edits. Social media like Instagram, for instance, are not WP:reliable sources. How will you ensure your edits are reliably sourced? Please tell me what that means in your own words. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly i take info from official websites, but sometimes I also checked the official account in social media for which I know it is not a reliable source but it was the only source available at that moment. Agon Mustafa (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably you should ask about that type of sourcing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk in so far as content is concerned. However, that is not sufficient to establish meeting inclusion criteria-- subjects of articles must meet inclusion requirements with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to say again that i agree with you, and i want to tell again that a have read the rules of wikipedia about how to create an article, what should it contain etc.

Also i want to tell you that a wont make "big changes" on any article without getting the permission from an admin. Agon Mustafa (talk) 18:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we cannot take the time to hold your hand. Either you are competent to edit constructively or you are not. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's move on to moving drafts, and edit warring,. and inaccurate edit summaries. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About moving drafts that was the reason why i got banned because at that time i didn't know the rules of Wikipedia

About edit summaries sometimes I didn't give the description about my edit for no reason at all, and now I know that it is against the rules. Agon Mustafa (talk) 21:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh this is open again. Maybe tomorrow I will return -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it turns out there are no reliable sources to establish notability for your chosen topics, what else would you edit about? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anything about Republic of Kosova I will try to fix or add info.

Mostly I will edit articles about sports or history that have to do with Kosova or Albania. Agon Mustafa (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed unblock conditions[edit]

@Yamla:-- unblock consult with blocking admin.

All new article creation will be via WP:AFC Drafts.
No moving of Drafts to article space.
WP:1RR User may not revert another user more than once for any given page or article. Must discuss and gain agreement/WP:consensus for the change.
Will seek help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk in so far as content sourcing is concerned.
Will need to not coordinate edits with friends, relatives, and people appellant does or does not know off-Wiki.
Will need to only use/have one Wikipedia account.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe I am the blocking admin (subsequent blocks are to modify my original block). I'm on board with the above if the user is. I suggest the user refrain from article creation (even as a draft) until they've built up a meaningful edit history and are more familiar with the rules. That's a suggestion, not a suggested requirement, though. Specifically, the user is free to ignore that suggestion, so long as they follow the requirements as you've outlined. --Yamla (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ima ready if you are ready -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Agon Mustafa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I'm re-requesting unblock for my account. Special:permalink/1195976126#Proposed unblock conditions

Accept reason:

Many thanks. Welcome back-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much 😊,

I have one last question what should I do with the account that I created ("Agon Mustafa 2")? Agon Mustafa (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Editing with that would most assuredly lead to you being blocked. For now, must use only one account. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Right now i tried to edit one article bit it still shows that im blocked.

Here is a link(outside the wikipedia) of a screenshot to see the error im facing.

(https://ibb.co/1dbfxVD) Agon Mustafa (talk) 18:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is weird Should be fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay.

I just wanted to make sure if it was okay in my side.

I will wait some days and check if it will be fixed, if not I will contact you again.

Have a nice day! Agon Mustafa (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The block on this account? Should be fixed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Log out. Wait 24 hours, then log in. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sports broadcasting contracts in Kosovo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports broadcasting contracts in Kosovo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sports broadcasting contracts in Albania for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports broadcasting contracts in Albania, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Albania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]