User talk:Agungsn

Welcome...

Hello, Agungsn, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Spinning Spark 15:56, 29 October 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agungsn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i won't do it again ✗ (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}{{unblock}}

Your edits[edit]

Unfortunately, I have found it necessary to revert a very high percentage of your edits. Many of them introduce grammatical or stylistic errors without any new information. I won't list all the issues individually, but you should have a list of edits that have been reverted in your notifications and you can click on them individually to see the reason for reverting. Please feel free to contact me if you need further explanation on any of them. In the meantime, I suggest you avoid making edits that are solely stylistic until you have a better understanding of our Manual of Style.

On sourcing, Blogspot is a particularly bad place to look for sources, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. In any case, sources should only be added to the references if they are verifying some of the article text and there is not already a suitable source cited. Adding something to "Further reading" or "External links" might be ok (but please, not random blogs). You can find the correct way to format citations at Wikipedia:Citing sources. SpinningSpark 16:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, enough is enough. Please stop making random stylistic and grammar changes. You clearly don't know what you are doing and I suspect your first language is not English. Your last edit makes no sense at all and along with your editing history is beginning to smell of deliberate disruption. SpinningSpark 14:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for continuing to make unhelpful stylistic edits after failing to discuss issues raised with you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpinningSpark 18:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agungsn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have too many reason, hey admin give me an example of Usefull Contribution, pls Agungsn (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for the block, and if you are unable to tell a constructive contribution you would make, or even know what a constructive contribution is, you lack the skills needed to participate here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

@331dot: Hey, came here

[edit]

@331dot: im waiting

[edit]

@331dot: come ✗ (talk) 14:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

@331dot:

[edit]

@331dot: Hey, I won't bite someone

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]