User talk:Aidepikiwmeca

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Erzurum Vilayet, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Armenian Genocide, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Armenian Genocide. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lennart97 (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Armenian Genocide, you may be blocked from editing. Lennart97 (talk) 12:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t · c) buidhe 13:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content on articles[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vardenik. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove any more historical information on articles, you've been warned several times now regarding this. For example - the historical information you removed on Vardenik and that you said was false on the talk page of the Artsvanist article regarding their founding, is information that is found in the guidebook "Rediscovering Armenia". You can read the online version of its section on the Gegharkunik Province here: [1]. AntonSamuel (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]