User talk:Airiox

Re: Brady[edit]

I'm not suggesting at all that the information isn't factual. But just saying that "Belichick is X-X with Brady and Y-Y without" means nothing on its own. You need context. If you simply supply the stats and expect the reader to make conclusions based on them, the entry is not notable. Pats1 ^T/C 20:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monson[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to Thomas S. Monson. We have worked hard to prepare the article for WP:Good article status (it is recently awaiting GA review); in the future, please help us by keeping your citations consistent with others by using WP:CITE formatting (specifically, WP: Cite web and WP:Cite book). Thank you! --Eustress (talk) 16:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]