Jump to content

User talk:Aitthen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD Nomination: Lucas Biespiel‎[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Lucas Biespiel‎ meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Biespiel‎. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dlabtot (talk) 02:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 06:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Bart133, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: User:Bart133 was changed by Aitthen (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-08-04T06:59:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 07:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aitthen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was a little drunk last night. I deeply apologize if I offended anybody. I had a lot of fun with the editing (before I had a few drinks) and wanted to try and help clean up wikipedia. Please unblock me! I wont go off on stupid rants again.

Decline reason:

Blocked for good reason, should be indefinite. Toddst1 (talk) 19:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aitthen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, I won't do anything today. I'm so sorry about what I did. However, I was at Lucas Biespiel's house yesterday, and added his page over there on his computer (didn't tell him about it). The only reason he didn't know is that he was gone when I did it (music lesson). He just called me and told me that now he can't do anything on wikipedia because it wasn't my account that was blocked, it was his IP Address. I promise I wont do anything until the block is clear, just unblock it so he can use wikipedia.

Decline reason:

His IP address was autoblocked because you were logged in there when you were blocked. It should expire within 24 hours provided you don't log in on his IP address again. If he wants the block cleared, his block message should give him instructions on how to request it be cleared. Next time, consider the consequences of your actions before getting drunk. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emo, you will be blocked from editing. TheLetterM (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]