User talk:Ajohnson2199

Hello, I'm My Ubuntu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Triangle (instrument) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —My Ubuntu (talk) 13:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Triangle (instrument). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Triangle (instrument) was changed by Ajohnson2199 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861028 on 2014-05-20T16:11:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ƒ== May 2014 == You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Triangle (instrument). —SMALL JIM 16:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster _talk 16:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what I have done.

I understand what I have done was vandalism and was never viewed as 'humorous" by the Wikipedia community. I have also realized that what I have done could also be infectious, Meaning that other accounts used for vandalism would see it and think that they can do it too. I can assure the entire Wikipedia community that I will not repeat my vandalism again. I will only edit when necessary and when I do edit, it will be productive, not destructive. I apologize to the Wikipedia community. Ajohnson2199 (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Ajohnson2199[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajohnson2199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mean this with as much respect as I can display through this message. I know that when I was trying to disrupt the normal routine on Wikipedia by messing up articles and making false statements that it was not to be tolerated. But I have learned my lesson. As you can see by the edit I made on the "Arson" page, I am trying to make edits that are valid and that do not spark any controversial arguments. I made this new account with the intention of showing the Wikipedia community that I am remorseful for my wrong and am trying to fix things and set them straight. Although it was also my mistake to not read through the kinds of ways that you can be blocked, such as in my case, "Evasion". But I can assure the Wikipedia community that I was not trying to evade, but in fact trying to act more like an responsible Wikipedia user should act. Please look at this message. Ajohnson2199 (talk) 16:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A responsible, remorseful person does not further violate policies by a) evading their original block, or b) vandalizing. You, the person are blocked. Until you resolve the block on your first account, you are NOT permitted ever to edit Wikipedia the panda ₯’ 10:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.