Jump to content

User talk:Ak-Akhil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First msg[edit]

Hello, I'm Phani M. I have detected that your edits to List of highest-grossing Tollywood (Telugu) films are without reliable sources and includes unexplained content removal. So I undid it.Deliberate vandalism forces other to block you. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page.Thank you.Phani M (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ak-Akhil, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Ak-Akhil!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm Phani M. I have detected that you tried to post a message to someone.But the way of posting is not correct. So I undid it.You should leave a message on talk pages only not in the middle of articles.

And regarding your request, proper sources are not avialble to keep the total gross figures. I've tried to get top-10 but failed, on your request I'll try again.You too welcome to add content with reliable sources. Thank you.Phani M (talk) 11:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of highest-grossing Indian films has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Elassint Hi 05:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of highest-grossing Indian films may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Listof highest-grossing Indianfilms worldwide#Telugu_cinema]]Merge discussion|date=December 2013}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:40, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of highest-grossing Indian films was changed by Ak-Akhil (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853998 on 2014-04-26T08:45:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding Tollywood films merge[edit]

Hi. I'm Phani M. I'm strictly opposing the merge. But as per the disussion which is going on in the talk page of Indian films, to revert the merge I need support. Result based on the no. and standard of supporting persons. To add your voice join the discussion and enter your opinion.

And you should post msgs on the bottom of the talk page to avoid the searching of msg. And you should include your signature. Then he can reply him easily. Thank you. Phani M (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding tollywood page[edit]

Hi this Ak-Akhil i'm complety oppising the merging of articls and i support phaneendra to continue his page

Information icon Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of highest-grossing Indian films, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStartalk 13:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of highest-grossing Indian films with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStartalk 14:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of highest-grossing Indian films was changed by Ak-Akhil (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963432 on 2014-04-30T11:37:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. You've been asked kindly not to remove content from said article - don't do it again.MelbourneStartalk 11:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding tollywood page[edit]

Hi. I'm Phani M. As I observed your recent edits, I'm suggesting you not to post messages on the article pages. You should post messages on user/article talk pages only.

If you are trying to oppose the merge of tollywood films article, a discussion is going on in the talk page of List of highest-grossing Indian films. Open it, go to merge discussion in the talk page and then post your opinion of supporting or opposing. Requests won't work. -Ph@n!M 16:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm again telling/warning you. Post messages on talk pages only. And no one has the authority on articles including page creator. Any one can contribute, even you can also revert the merge, but you have to fight for the existence of that revert.

To decline the merge add your support against merge in the merge discussion which is going on in the talk page of List of highest-grossing Indian films. -Ph@n!M 15:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaneendra M (talkcontribs)


Phani M 13:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaneendra M (talkcontribs)

Regrading tollywood page[edit]

i'm compltly opposing the merge of tollywood to List of highest- grossing indian films and i completly support to make tollywood page . -akhi@l!Ak 9:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Who cares the messages in your talk pages except you. I can do nothing with your support by posting message on my talk page. If you really opposing the merge, post your opinion in the given link, Merge discussion. There is no value to your messages on my and your talk pages. Know properly about them. -Ph@n!M 13:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaneendra M (talkcontribs)

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ak-Akhil. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 04:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MelbourneStartalk 04:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tollywood Page[edit]

Hello. I'm Phani M. There is no chance of creating new article as other one was merged. But I created the same article in simple wikipedia. To check click here. -Phani M talk 12:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last Reply[edit]

Hello. I'm Phani M. I've suggested you many times what to do to revert the merge. You ignored that. Whatever you post on my talk page, I decicded to reply after your support in merge discussion. To participate click here. Thank you. -Phani M talk 08:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in the merge discussion. You just opposed it but posted no reason which may result in nothing. Try to give valid reason in the disucssion. Wikipedia is more important than one article. So I can't cheat anyone. Decison should be based on consensus of wiki users. Then only it will be good to all. One more reasonable support will surely favour us. If you need article only then go to simple wikipedia. Same article, existing there. Thank you. -Phani M talk — Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

objection noted[edit]

yes i have seen that you have stated that you object on multiple pages . but i have not seen that you have articulated any actual basis for your objection that has any merit/ weight in wikipedia. repeating a baseless objection multiple times does not make it any more valid or any more likely to be heeded.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to change the numbers, you need to provide a source that justifies changing it. Otherwise anyone could just make up whatever they want. I question whether we should be using Andraboxoffice.com as a source here so I don't think there's anything justifying anything there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, discussion comments go on the Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films page, not in the article itself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:46, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the article has been protected by an administrator because of an edit war. you will need to ask another administrator to remove the protection or wait till the protection expires, or better yet, use the talk page to generate consensus for the changes you propose which will then be made to the article by an administrator. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING[edit]

Stop making false edit summaries as you did in this edit. [1] . Doing so to attempt to cover up a disruptive edit will lead to you being blocked from editing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]