User talk:Akshaygs

Speedy deletion of OPNET Technologies[edit]

A tag has been placed on OPNET Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:OPNET logo.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:OPNET logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 16:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re; OPNET[edit]

In response to your query on my talk page, it reads like a press release (to me at least). Feel free to get a second opinion if you disagree. Best, Javert ⁽^T^·^C⁾ 23:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the "press release" type content from the first section. Is it any better? Also how do I ask for a second opinion? Akshaygs (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]