User talk:Albert20009

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Albert20009! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 02:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, I'm glad to see your gnoming work. However, some of it has involved overlinking. Could you please see WP:OVERLINK? In particular, dates and other chronological units need a specific rationale to be linked. Well-known geographical entities, the same. Thanks in advance. Tony (talk) 08:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Millahnna (talk) 08:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style by using disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 08:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Broadcasting Corporation[edit]

I've reverted your edits to this article as they do not follow the Wikipedia guideline established at WP:Manual of style and elsewhere. I see you have been warned about this previously. Please do not repeat this practice. I would not want you to be blocked over something that is very easy to avoid. Tiderolls 01:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for causing disruption by linking dates and excessive inter-linking after warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 01:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that if you resume this disruption when you block expires you face the possibility of longer blocks. Tiderolls 01:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to link dates and interlinking terms against consensus. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 01:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]