User talk:Albert Romano 1965

January 2011

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia anyone can edit". Even subjects of articles cannot control the content of them. Crazy, eh? DMacks (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I don't know if you really are Al Romano, but if you are you might like to check what changes you make - your last edit added back a load of abusive vandalism rather than removing it - but thankfully it has been removed again now. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

The cited reference clearly assigns two stars. You changed the statement to say four stars. Per wikipedia policy, articles have to use what the cited references say. Please stop changing content based on sources that are not present--if you have a reliable source that supports your idea, please include it. Otherwise, don't change cited content. DMacks (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Ive given you all the cited sources. i sent you copies of the actual articles info-en-q@wikimedia.org thanks AL ROMANO Ps i dont know the cited references that u have that say a 2 star review? thats not the case. it shocked me at the time when we kept getting 4 star reviews. Ray Gillen died! People felt bad. the album smoked and people loved it. so this thing with the 2 stars its just a mistake somebody made when they fixed it last time it got vandalized. It may have been fixed by Vikki. she made a mistake. Ill have Her try to fix it but i sent u all the sources. Sorry to be a pain but im proud of those reviews we got. Its a testament to the late Ray Gillen and his last recordings before he died. A 2 star review is a failure! we never got a 2 star review. all 4 stars worldwide! thanks AL

At the end of the sentence that says two-star, is a link that looks like ^[3]. In the article that's a hyperlink to a footnote. It goes to an external link that says "Rating" with two stars next to it. In order to say "four star", we need a specific reference (webpage, newspaper (including date and page), or other bibliographic data to support your claim. We actually don't need the article itself, we require enough information about it that anyone can look it up themselves. DMacks (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)