User talk:AlejandroR1990

December 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Specifically, don't insert "st", "nd", "rd", or "th" after dates per MOS:DATE. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Edward Kennedy, Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Edward Kennedy, Jr.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Courtney Kennedy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Courtney Kennedy.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Chris Kennedy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chris Kennedy.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Max Kennedy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Max Kennedy.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Doug Kennedy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Doug Kennedy.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Courtney Kennedy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Courtney Kennedy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 13:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing replaceable fair use templates

Hi AlejandroR1990. Please do not remove replaceable fair use templates from files like you did here, here, here, here, and here. These files have been tagged with template because another editor, in this case Steel1943, feels they do not satisfy Wikipedia's policy regarding the use of non-free content (the "NFCC"). All non-free content, including non-free images such as these, are required to satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP. Please follow the template's instructions and use the replaceable fair use disputed template if you feel the usage of the image does satisfy WP:NFCC#1; An administrator will eventually review the file and determine who is correct. Please try and understand that Wikipedia takes copyright related matters quite seriously. Although Wikipedia does allow the usage of certain copyrighted content (i.e., "non-free content"), there are fairly strict limitations placed upon such usage and generally non-free images of living person's are not considered acceptable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Michael LeMoyne Kennedy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michael LeMoyne Kennedy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 20:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I changed this picture File:Michael LeMoyne Kennedy.jpg for this another File:Michael LeMoyne Kennedy, 1987.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:David Anthony Kennedy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Anthony Kennedy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of World War II aces from Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JG 1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of World War II (1941)

I reverted your change, where you stated that the invasion of Yugoslavia ended in 1941. That's contrary to history. The only thing I can think of that you might be referring to is the transition from invasion to occupation. The normal way that is phrased is to specify that occupation begins, rather than invasion ends. In this particular case, my understanding was partition and occupation. But usually one considers an occupation as the continuation of an invasion, not the end of an invasion. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 04:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Barron Trump. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 16:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlejandroR1990. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hugo Broch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hugo Broch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hugo Broch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hugo Broch.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Franz Dienert, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 06:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, fair enough, good point - but you did not explain your edit, hence why I reverted! Giant Snowman 07:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlejandroR1990. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerd Kische, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miklós Fehér, 2003.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miklós Fehér, 2003.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Germany national football team does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to England national football team. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Source quite clearly lists both players as defenders. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cucho Hernández, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giannis Gianniotas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marc-Vivien Foé, 2003.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wolfgang Peters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Málaga CF and others, you may be blocked from editing. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Converting references in a wrong way and removing numbers without an official source is vandalism. It doesn't matter if you work for Málaga or not. In Wikipedia you will have to respect the guidelines. Thank you, MYS 77 ^✉ 15:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No way to make you understand, right? I've already told you: no sources, no changes. Numbers stay the same until any official announcement to prove the contrary. And players who are appearing in the pre-season with the first-team should not be listed in the first-team squad. Let's hope this time you read this message and understand the guidelines here. MYS 77 ^✉ 20:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Website changed today, Tighadouini isn't even listed on the squad... Ontiveros is listed as #17, Héctor as #19... You, who actually claims that work inside Málaga, should know that. Instead, you're editing in a wrong and disruptive manner. MYS 77 ^✉ 14:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits to Manchester United F.C. and Manchester United F.C. Reserves and Academy. I'm not sure why you think Millen Baars is English, or even of your reasoning for any of your other changes, but please stop. – Pee Jay 09:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What old squad numbers? None of the numbers you were removing had ever been officially removed by the club. And as I mentioned, you said Millen Baars was English when he clearly isn't... – Pee Jay 14:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please take a hint? Every time you make an edit to Manchester United F.C. Reserves and Academy, I have to come along and fix your mistakes. Either learn what it is you're doing wrong or stop doing it please. – Pee Jay 15:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Málaga CF squad

Still not how it works here. Take a look at the club's official website. Who is listed in the first team squad? I don't see neither Iván Rodríguez, nor Abdel, nor Iván Jaime. They can still play for the first team and appear in first team matchdays (maybe playing, maybe as substitutes), that's why we list them under the 'reserve team' section. You need to learn on how to edit here before making pointless reverts, because doing so is vandalism.

Thank you, MYS 77 ^✉ 01:27, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlejandroR1990. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlejandroR1990. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Player removals

Hi, please ensure you at least include an edit summary when removing players from squad lists such as your recent edit at Cardiff City. I'm not sure why you chose to remove those players. Kosack (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chelsea F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Liverpool F.C.. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You will surely be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced content to Wikipedia and violate Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, as you did to Ole Gunnar Solskjær. – Flix11 (talk) 04:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Málaga CF.

Also, do remind to follow what the official website lists as first-team players or not. Your edits in Málaga's squad are still unconstructive. MYS 77 ^✉ 04:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding Jony in Málaga's page. He's a Lazio player and played for them. IF, and only if, FIFA say he's a Málaga player, we will add them back, but until that happens he should NOT be listed there. MYS 77 ^✉ 13:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Málaga CF

If I'm not mistaken, YOU were the one who asked ME to follow the official website, and when I do that, you revert me without a proper explanation? I am removing Quinela because he's neither listed in the first team squad nor appeared in any first team matches until now. Antoñín was recently added, and that's a correct edit from you. But call me "Mr. Perfect" again, and I'll report you per WP:NPA.

I do hope we reach some compromise here, I've explained in the edit summaries about WP:RED countless times but you don't seem to listen. Now I'm obsessed with you? You're out of your mind, fella, plus your edits are often unconstructive and need some adjustments. Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 21:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing player moves

Hi, great to see our willingness to contribute to Wikipedia. However, when you update a player's article regarding a transfer, you need to leave a source from a reliable site. Your edit on Álex Mula, for example, did not have a reference, here is a template that can help you:

<ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|trans-title=|publisher=|language=|date=|access-date=}}</ref>

Thanks for your further correct contributions, happy editing! TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 19:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Álex Mula transfer

I see what you mean. However, an edit summary would not be relevant to prove a source. You should leave it in the article itself after your edit, just like the rest of Wikipedia's structure. TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 02:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Badr Boulahroud article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 11:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Tarl N. (discuss) 01:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that I reverted your edit to Timeline of World War II (1940) removing the mention of Kennedy, because there was no explanation of why it was removed. I suggest you take it to the talk page if you still regard that line as being inappropriate. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Málaga names/reserve teams

Hi there,

I've reverted you because the vast majority of articles I could found over Ismael Casas and Cristo Romero call them by just that, "Ismael Casas" and "Cristo Romero". I know that Málaga's website list them as "Ismael" and "Cristo" respectively, but we should respect the website when it comes to squad list. When it comes to player names, WP:COMMONNAME should be considered. I think you are missing this very point, I've been trying to explain but you are not giving valid reasons to stick by those names. As I've said before, provide sources over their names, that I'll gladly change them;
About reserve teams: as I've said in my last edit summary, those youth players are included when they make the first team call-up. You can see in all those pages: Ilaix Moriba, Konrad de la Fuente, Santi Ramos Mingo and so on never played a first team match for Barcelona. Altube never played a match for Real Madrid. And as you can see, I'm only listing these players here because I wasn't the one who was adding them, so you can't say that I'm the only one doing these edits. I'm merely following a "guideline" here (more of a standard, to be honest) where we might reflect better which youth players are involved with the first team. If you don't agree with the approach, it might be better to bring it up at WT:FOOTY, where other people can discuss about it and give their opinions over the subject.

Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 03:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lorenzo Zúñiga Owono

Hello, AlejandroR1990,

Thank you for creating Lorenzo Zúñiga Owono.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To establish notability WP:FFOOTY there needs to be a reliable reference to making his debut at senior level. Thanks for the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 16:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FritzChristen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FritzChristen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tommy Taylor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Taylor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roger Byrne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roger Byrne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Mark Jones (football player, born 1933).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mark Jones (football player, born 1933).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:David Anthony Kennedy, 1983.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Anthony Kennedy, 1983.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Málaga CF

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Málaga CF, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:David Pegg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Pegg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Málaga CF. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I think you need to stop this, especially if you have admin aspirations. The first question that will come up is why you didn't seek the talk page. Drmies (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, on December 9, 2023, I reorganized a section of this article (First-team squad) based on the rules of the Royal Spanish Football Federation which states that players wearing numbers 1 to 25 are first-team players, while those wearing numbers 26 onwards are reserves (You can look it in this link, point 4in the page 5: https://rfef.es/sites/default/files/images19/001_primera_y_segunda_division.pdf). During this time there were no problems with this until July 13 of this year, when the user MalaguistaUK decided to put it as he saw fit. AlejandroR1990 (talk) 21:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To this I add that this user has made personal attacks on me(you simpleton: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M%C3%A1laga_CF&diff=prev&oldid=1243500821), so he should be reported per WP:NPA. AlejandroR1990 (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct: I warned them. That's not OK. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And according to your suggestion I opened a section on Málaga CF's talk page where I try to explain why I organized that section the way I did based on a primary source such as the regulations of a national football federation. AlejandroR1990 (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably that start a new edit war in this article because there is an user with no account using different IPs from Macedonia (77.29.187.16, 77.29.179.155, 77.29.151.66, ...) currently blocked all of them because is vandalising this article and other football team articles. One person fixed this article and this person vandalized this again. 195.57.85.85 (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:GiantSnowman, do you have any opinion on the actual dispute? You know this is not my area of expertise. Drmies (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From my perspective, if a player has a first-team number, we list them with the first-team. Giant Snowman 15:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]