User talk:Alessandro.capone

Welcome!

Hello, Alessandro.capone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alessandro Capone linguistics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E. Fokker (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alessandro Capone linguistics[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alessandro Capone linguistics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Mey is one of the most important professors in the pragmatics of language and general linguistics. Why should this article be deleted?

Nomination of Jacob L. Mey for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jacob L. Mey, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob L. Mey until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 08:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Capone has recently obtained a position as ass. professor.

Nomination of Alessandro Capone (linguist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Alessandro Capone (linguist), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Capone (linguist) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - I have noted on the AfD discussion page that both you and User:Scilipoti.venera have created versions of the article. I would love it if you and/or she can produce evidence of notability according to Wikipedia's criteria, but there is still none in the article and I cannot find any. However, AfD discussions are opportunities to discuss an article and try to solve its problems. They are not instant deletion like the PROD process. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorin Stati, glottologist and pragma-linguist[edit]

Sorin Stati held for a number of years the chair of linguistics at the University of Bucharest; then, due to a conflict with the official regime, which imposed a brutal control over academics, he moved to Italy where he obtained temporary lectureships at the University of Pavia and Venice. He then obtained the chair of linguistics at the University of Messina and then migrated to the University of Bologna where he held the chair of linguistics.

Sorin Stati obtained two doctorates in linguistics:

1967 : doctorate in general linguistics with the thesis: Théorie et méthode en syntaxe, published in éditions de l’Académie Roumaine; transalted into Italian as Teoria e metodo nella sintassi, Bologna il mulino, 1972.

1978 : doctorate at Sorbonne University with the thesis: Le système sémantique des adjectifs dans la langue roumaine, published by Jean Fayard (1979).

Sorin Stati was vice-President of the SILF and President of the IADA (International Association for Dialogue Analysis) until he retired due to old age.

Stati wrote the following books:

Books

1976 La sintassi. 1977 Teorie sintattiche del Novecento. 1978 Manuale di semantica descrittiva. 1978 Introducción en la lingüística matematica. (Spanish translation of Stati 1966) 1979 La sémantique des adjectifs en langues romanes. 1979 La sintaxis. (Spanish translation of Stati 1976) 1982 Il dialogo, Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. 1985 Editor (with Ducos, G.) of: Actes du XI Colloque de linguistique fonctionnelle, Bologne 1984. 1986 Cinque miti della parola. Lezioni di lessicologia testuale. 1990 Le transphrastique. 1992 Editor (with Hundsnurscher, F/Weigand, E.) of: Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung Bologna 1990, 2 vol. 1993 Editor (with Weigand, E.) of: Methodologie der Dialoganalyse. 2002 Principi di analisi argomentativa, Pàtron.

For the articles and other detailed information please go the Sorin Stati's official website http://sorin.stati.free.fr/biography.php.

References

http://linguistlist.org/issues/19/19-268.html http://sorin.stati.free.fr/biography.php

Capone, Alessandro, Obituary: Sorin Stati, a linguist, Journal of Pragmatics March 40 (2008), 581-582.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sorin Stati.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Sorin Stati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Please don't edit war to enter self-published sources on articles. Also see our rules on external links. Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Barack Obama. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SImilarly, you should not be inserting external links to your work to other articles, as you did at James Higginbotham with this edit: [1]. See WP:ELNO, WP:SPS, and WP:COI. Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 00:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alessandro.capone. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alessandro.capone/Alessandro capone linguist[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Alessandro.capone/Alessandro capone linguist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]