User talk:Alex.m.2333

September 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wasim Akram has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wasim Akram was changed by Alex.m.2333 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855479 on 2014-09-07T11:32:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alex.m.2333, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Alex.m.2333! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 08:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 22:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Mahnoor Baloch have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Please note that blogs and gossip sites are not considered to be reliable sources. There are other sources already sited for her age, where she was born, etc. Any information violating WP:BLP is not acceptable for Wikipedia. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mian Family Baghbanpura. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mahnoor Baloch. Iryna Harpy (talk) 08:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

You are under investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John.V.1112.Charles (talk) 10:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of John.V.1112 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]