Jump to content

User talk:Alex92126

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Alex92126, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurora Fine Chemicals Group (October 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 05:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed by SwisterTwister submission of article Aurora Fine Chemicals Group

[edit]

Too suggestive of an advertised business profile, sources are too trivial and notability cannot be inherited from others.

Hello SwisterTwister, thank you for your review of our submission of article Aurora Fine Chemicals Group. I appreciate and accept your opinion as an expert. I was just wondering what is a difference between our company article and our competitors like Chemical Diversity[1], Enamine[2], ChemSpace[3], that are working in the same field and simply reproduced the content of their web pages, have more than trivial sources or no 3rd parties sources at all, let alone no notability in their articles and nevertheless accepted by Wikipedia! How is it possible? Please be honest with me and yourself though as you cited on your home page Thomas Jefferson: Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom. Again, thank you. Best, Alex Alex92126 (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurora Fine Chemicals Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurora Fine Chemicals Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurora Fine Chemicals Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alex92126. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aurora Fine Chemicals Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 11:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]