User talk:AlexArago

Welcome!

Hello, AlexArago, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Art Resilience movement, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Art Resilience movement

The article Art Resilience movement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I find no pertinent, independent coverage of this in reliable sources. It doesn't strike me that as an artistic movement it's achieved notability. The entire description of the movement is from the perspective of the participants' motivations behind it rather than in terms of any objective explanation of what it is.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC) @Largoplazo: Hello, You are right, the movement has not notability, it is new. I agree that we must remove the considerations on the proposals of members and remain only on the information. --AlexArago (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure that article Art Resilience movement must be merged with Ksenia Milicevic because she is not unique founding member of the movement. There are eight other founding artists and several other participants. She just inicitated the movement.--AlexArago (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Stone (sculptor)

Help On the page Christopher Stone (sculptor), the title User:Nachette/Christopher Stone (sculptor) is incorrect. Is it possible to change it to Christopher Stone (sculptor)? Can someone help please?--AlexArago (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I have submitted your draft article on Christopher Stone for peer review. If the reviewers consider that the article is ready for publication, the title will be changed to Christopher Stone (sculptor). Regards, —capmo (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Best regards.--AlexArago (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Stone (sculptor) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

There is a bit of a challenge with the referencing. Ideally please add links to online versions of the references. This is not compulsory, but we write for ordinary readers who like the instant gratification of being able to see what is written in the reference with ease.

The other issue is that I am not sure that the references you have chosen prove that the gentleman is notable in a Wikipedia sense, and I have a feeling he may fail WP:BIO

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Stone (sculptor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 16:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AlexArago, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 16:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Faddle

Thank you for your advise. I read the text carefully. Wikipedia is something extraordinary and I completely agree that we must be mindful and check everything. This is precisely what gives it quality. Thank you for help. For Christopher Stone I'll do some research to see if I can find more sources. Best regards.--AlexArago (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Christopher Stone (sculptor)

Hello, AlexArago. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christopher Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Art Resilience movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art Resilience movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Resilience movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Stone (sculptor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Stone (sculptor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Stone (sculptor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theredproject (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bare Urls on the template Ksenia Milicevic

Hello,

I have fixed the issue,  but I don't know how to remove the template message.

Thank you in advenc for help. Alex Arago AlexArago (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]