User talk:Alexander.Chacon (drake)

Welcome!

Hello, Alexander.Chacon (drake), and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at User:Alexander.Chacon (drake)/sandbox, you may be blocked from editing. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 06:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Septrillion: Hey mate, I was very surprise because I thought that was fine to create the article from Scratch in sandbox, but was very quick that i receive the welcome and after that the message for deletion, i was working in several things at the same i was tired I don't realise about the message to avoid deletion of your markup. Thanks Alexander.Chacon (drake) (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do it again. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 15:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alexander.Chacon (drake). The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alexander.Chacon (drake)|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Really i wanna understand all that you´re trying to understand that you explain me, i was working in a draft version , I work for Global IO but my intention is not to make promotion, is just clarify the concept about Integrated Operations, the idea is that all the stuff mentioned in the article will be of public domain, non copyrighted materials. So what I need to explain in addition to be able to add the new concepts with their independent sources?

Alexander.Chacon (drake) (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: I have moved the thread to this page. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 07:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Based on your feedback, what is your opinion of this page https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Consulting_Group. Alexander.Chacon (drake) (talk) 07:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The easy bit first. The linked article looks like rubbish, but it's on Spanish-language Wikipedia. I'm not an admin there, and i don't know their policies, the different language wikipedias are independent

Every spammer claims that their contributions aren't really spam, just informing people. I note that you have been consistently disruptive, removing every speedy deletion tag Septrillion had added, despite it being clearly stated that you must not do so. :::Your text is largely unsourced, the company appears not to meet the notability guidelines, the text is promotional, e.g. Achieving dynamic, enterprise-wide optimisation of value chains by creating the right culture, displaying the right behaviours, and empowering people by providing the right context and awareness.. You are not allowed to spam even in your sandbox.

Read the comments I have posted above, and those at the top of the page. If you do not edit in accordance with what you have been told, or edit disruptively, you will be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak:, Ok thanks I don't fully agree with your feedback but i will be more neutral in the edition, the another think that i realise is that is better work in the content outside to have a very well document article instead to start creating in sandbox. I'm learning how to publish and understanding how Wikipedia works. anyway please tell how i can recover the text that i did to work in a cleansing new article.

Alexander.Chacon (drake) (talk) 15:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just a matter of neutral tone, you have to make sure that your company meets the notability criteria I've linked, or it will be deleted on those grounds alone. I'm not prepared to restore the text, it's too promotional and lacking in facts. I looked at the refs, one is the company's own website, not an acceptable source, the other was this; the abstract, which is all I can see, doesn't fully support your claim. The code for your infobox is below Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{Userspace draft|date=July 2018}} {{Infobox company | name = Global IO | logo = | type = [[Privately held company|Private]] | industry = [[Management Consulting]] | fate = | predecessor =  | successor =  | founded = {{Start date and age|2014|01|01}} in [[Perth]], [[Western Australia]], [[Australia]] | founders = {{Plainlist| * Dominic Collins * Pieter Lottering * Eamonn Treacy }} | hq_location_city = Perth | hq_location_country = Australia | area_served =  | products = | num_employees = 15 | num_employees_year =  | parent = | website = http://www.globalio.com }}