Jump to content

User talk:Alexas27/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice evaluation and comparison of the two websites. Were there any specific changes you might like to see on either site? Jmmcabee (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)jmmcabee[reply]

Comments on Ideas Draft

[edit]

Both of these look like very promising articles. There is a lot that could be added to plants in space as you noted and found some references for. And photoreceptor protein seems pretty important to make sure it is complete. I would say go ahead and make those changes regardless of which article you end up choosing. Jmmcabee (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)jmmcabee[reply]

Comments on Article Revision

[edit]

Your content looks great and well-written. I see you put it up on the talk page of the article. It looks like you might need to review how to cite and include references. Jmmcabee (talk)jmmcabee —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on second draft

[edit]

First of all i am so jealous that you got this topic, i love it. One grammatical thing: "Earth conditions , not earth condition. I think that you did a really good job including only relevant information and making the section very readable. It really shows how much work you put into this article, good job! maybe you could include an over arching statement about what all of these experiments together show about how plants respond in space. Other than that i think that it's really good. IsabellaGulino (talk) 06:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Comments

[edit]

- Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic and I wasn't distracted by anything. Good job!

- I really like how you kept your article neutral and fact-based.

- I think your viewpoints are accurately represented.

- The links work great! The sources definitely support the article where they were used.

- You did a good job of placing your citations within your paragraphs instead of at the end. Most of your sources were primary literature which was good.

- Good job summarizing the results of the experiments. Could you summarize the results of any more of the experiments presented in the original article?

Lfgarcia726 (talk) 2:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Lucas G.