User talk:Alkazar9999

Alkazar9999, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alkazar9999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2021 Los Angeles Chargers–Las Vegas Raiders game, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 01:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Honda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Thank you for reverting your recent edits on the pages David Duke‎ and Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal. That said, please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your edits again on the Uvalde article - you need to discuss this on the talk page and get consensus. Fox is not an RS for political matters and what you're adding is undue. If you continue to add it, you will be edit warring and are likely to be blocked. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Alkazar9999 (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you refuse to engage, you're going to find yourself blocked a lot quicker. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Alkazar9999 (talk) 21:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you refuse to discuss this, we cannot come to an amicable solution. Why did you add a fake references in your last edit? PRAXIDICAE💕 22:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do Alkazar9999 (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Robb Elementary School shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Quin Snyder, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 23:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does one source their content? This NBA coach actually resigned and after I updated it, I was trying to figure out how to source the NBA website which reported it first. In the midst of this, I had an urgent matter to attend to and just came back. Is there a template for wikipedia sourcing so I don't find myself in this conversation again? Alkazar9999 (talk) 00:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]