User talk:Almeda64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello!

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Almeda64! Thank you for your contributions. I am HindWIKI and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HINDWIKICHAT 12:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Mariam-uz-Zamani[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Mariam-uz-Zamani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 00:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anupriya Goenka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Padmavati[edit]

Hey, Viacom will be releasing an official statement later this week to confirm the change in title and the release date. I know the Indian media loves to speculate, but can we please wait for the official statement to come out before adding it back to the lead? Thanks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct the padmavat collection total collection is 253 cr Rishudas1999 (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shilpa Shinde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hina Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy content from other sources[edit]

Hi there, re: this edit, you copied verbatim the phrase "which led to other bodily dysfunctions" from this article. This is not acceptable, because at best this is a copyright violation. All prose at Wikipedia must be written from scratch in your own words. In your haste to copy/paste, you introduced a significant reading comprehension error into the article. You wrote: "Shinde went into depression when her father died in 2013 of Alzheimer’s disease which led to other bodily dysfunctions." This is ambiguous phrasing that suggests either Shinde's depression led to her having "other bodily dysfunctions", or when her father died, his death led to him developing other bodily dysfunctions. The former is confusing, and the latter would be impossible, since he would be dead. The original phrasing reads "he was suffering from acute Alzheimer’s disease which led to other bodily dysfunctions", which means that the father's Alzheimer's disease led to other bodily dysfunctions, which he experienced before he died. Huge difference. I have fixed this for you, although you may want to think about why that content would belong in the early life section of the article. She was 36 when her father died, which doesn't sound like "Early life" for a 40-year-old woman. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy carefully. You are not allowed to combine 2 sources to reach a conclusion not mentioned in either of them. The historian's view is WP:UNDUE at Padmaavat as he does not talk about the film at all. Further, you are using his source to reach a conclusion that the film is incorrect, which is WP:POV. Lastly, the opinion of the historians vary from that of others, you are mentioning it as a fact. In the section Differences from Padmaavat, the plot comparison is unsourced. As for "why not delete the whole para", that's exactly what I did before you reverted me. King Prithviraj II (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hydari[edit]

Hi.

  • February 2004: Aditi Rao Hydari is a married person performing with Leela Samson's dance troupe [1]
  • 2013: Aditi Rao Hydari is revealed to be 34 by the Hindustan Times in an interview. She apparently married Satyadeep at 21. So likely around 2000-2001.[2] Firstpost suggest the same [3] As do Sify [4]
  • She's probably approaching 38/39 now. There does not seem to be any confirmation - so best to leave an age out for the moment. Also I'm sure it may impact Aditi's roles if an older age is put down.

Editor 2050 (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editor 2050 There is clear confirmation in this 2017 Indian Express article of her birth date. Why are you digging up 10+ year old articles to verify her age? Until you can find a reliable source which states that her birth date is not 28 October 1986 but something else, then please leave don't remove her birth date. I've currently cited 2 reliable sources for her birth date. As per this Deccan Chronicle article of 2016, she married Mishra at 21 so yes, as per her birth date she married him in 2007 - Almeda64 (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've decided to let 1986 remain until Hydari publicly bashes us like Vidya Balan once did. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aditi Rao Hydari[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aditi Rao Hydari . Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've read all the comments on the talk page, and all the references offered. I'm not seeing any biographical references that clearly settle the discrepancies among the many available references. If there's something I've overlooked, best to clearly identify the references on the talk page, describing how you believe they might settle the matter. Please respect WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE and gain consensus for the information you wish to include. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Box office[edit]

Ind nett 269cr Ind gross 350cr Overseas 180cr Worldwide 530cr 23 days Update Karunamoy Gorai (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Karunamoy Gorai What are you talking about? Almeda64 (talk) 14:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Almeda64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Almeda64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]