User talk:Aloknath yadav

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Aditya Mani Tripathi (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Faizabad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anand Sen Yadav. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 15:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC) @Dirkbb Dear sir i am telling that in anand sen article there were no proper sources and the format was not proper and there were no sections and the article maker is a relative of anand sen I am from bikapur and i know him. Secondly the edits of faizabad i want to ask why the edits where undone . In notable person i named . Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi whos article is accepted and added in Wikipedia is is a mla . He is a notable person thats why i named him . And last i am sorry if you feel i have done something wrong thats all i want to say Aloknath yadav (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aloknath yadav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[To everyone on wiki i am a new wiki contributor i dont know whats happening they are saying that i have been blocked . I request to all of you that i am not any blocker hacker anything . I also say that they are saying you are a puppet of aditya mani i dont know any mani wani please help me unblock ne i am not any hacker help help]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: see also the unblock request the sockmaster made on their talk page (User talk:Aditya Mani Tripathi) just minutes before this one was made... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 17:08, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aloknath yadav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[i am night any sock puppet why you all are doing this . You all are thinking wrong]

Decline reason:

Clearly the same person. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: see also the recent warning the sockmaster got on their talk page (User talk:Aditya Mani Tripathi).. just minutes before this request was made -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 10:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]