User talk:Alternative truth

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Alternative truth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nine Mile Ride, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unfortunately, your personal experience isn't a reliable source suitable for Wikipedia, because assertions made in Wikipedia articles must be independently verifiable. I also urge you to proofread your submissions much more carefully before saving them. While there are volunteers who focus on copyediting and proofreading, your submission was very difficult to understand at all--which is another reason reliable published sources are necessary; no one had the ability to look at your source material to try to fix the addition to the article. If you disagree with me or want more advice, please feel free to consult with the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC) I didn't give you citations I told about the ordnance survey map which is as good as citations you need plus I've been here for 50 years so I'm a personal witness and if what I'm saying is a lie then you bring your proof to show that what I've said is codswallopand yes I suffer from very strong dyslexia so you're telling me that my disability is stopping me from expressing the truth and my thoughts about the subject I know a lot about this subject. feel free to edit any obvious typos but don't delete my work because I haven't chromatically gone through it.warning this is just the beginning of the input I'm going to put into Wikipedia I've got a mass of knowledge to share and I will not be crushed by some desktop Warrior. Also the article talks about scenic routes between the M3 and M4 I've lived there for 50 years and I would never ever use 9 mile ride as a Cutthrough for those two roots it runs parallel to the M4 and M3 that doesn't make any sense that you would use that also it talks about it is a suburban street which clearly is not and I've driven the length of this road many many times and there is a large stretches of over a mile weather is no houses areall is heavily wooded and very quiet and then it talks about pubs and shops there's two pubs on the whole road and there is a cluster of shops near Finch Hampstead but largely he has no pubs and shops and large sections of the road have no houses fronting onto it I'm actually going to drive the road today and I'm going to measure the Rurel spots and the suburban spot and Measure the Rurel and suburban stretches and with also added comments about the Romani Gypsies who live down then I'm alright and I know for a fact that they help to build Broadmoor hospital in 1850 and that's why they live in that area and I had that bit of information into it The idea of the King The idea of the King George the third built 9 mile ride is a lie he may have used that road for hunting purposes as it became useful or he may have even renovated the road there is no evidence that the Royals hunted around the Crowthorne of the field area 9 mile ride is a massive trunk road way too big for hunting party to use practically King George the third would of never of paid for this role to be built if you look at all the other tracks coming out from Windsor great forest none of them are like 9 mile ride is totally peculiar and unique and and of course my reference to the 9 mile ride because I am a map specialist and if you gets very perfectly acceptable ordnance survey maps 174 land ranger series and you observe the roots of these things and you use a ruler to to extend the line of the 9 mile ride which is obviously a straight road and you extend the line west and east of the known used 9 mile ride it aligns up with the old Roman road of devils highway coming from Silchester and other endpoints to stains it is verifiable and you are knowledge Vandal. I have to dictate all my messages on my iPhone I'm not somebody who is just sits there on the desktop with all the resources and no dyslexia[reply]

Alternative truth, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Alternative truth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)