User talk:AlvarezQz
Welcome!
Hello, AlvarezQz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --seav (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted your changes to Manila articles wherein you deemphasized barangays and added barrios. These government units are officially called barangays. I also reverted your addition of an acute accent to San Andres, Manila; the accent is not used in the Philippines. --seav (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Philippines[edit]
Hi, I'd like you to explain why you keep on insisting that the Philippines drives on the left? As per the Right- and left-hand traffic, it clearly states that the country drives on the right. I dunno where you got the idea that it is otherwise.
Foreign words must be italicized, too, as per WP:MOSTEXT, so Republika ng Pilipinas should be Republika ng Pilipinas.
I also added a link for the term "diverse countries" in the lead because if there isn't, people won't know what it means.
I just kinda LOLed when you said you revert statements that are identified as "neutral." As per WP:NPOV, all statements must be neutral, so I don't get it why you revert them. -___-
Oh well, nice to be collaborating with you in WP. Xeltran (talk) 03:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- I already gave you one, look at Right- and left-hand traffic, it clearly says the Philippines drives on the right side of the lane! Are you referring to where the wheel is situated? You didn't even acknowledge the other edits that you just undid. And I already gave my sources.
PS. I'll just leave it at that for now, know only that if you want to continue reverting, you are violating the WP:3RR. Provide info at Talk:Philippines. Xeltran (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
No problem, i made a mistake, I thought you were talking about which "steering wheel" the philippine cars drive from. The Philippine steering wheels on cars are located from the "left side" and it is very different to the one used by the British. British type steering wheels are located in the right side. Thank you. AlvarezQz 19:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Philippines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Xeltran (talk) 04:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Why did you revert the lead section of the Philippines?[edit]
Why did you revert the lead section of the Philippines? Have you no sense of propriety? The Philippines lead section in Wikipedia is shamefully the most shortest lead section of a major country ever.
Just compare your current twisted and shortened version of the Philippine lead section: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippines&oldid=272653520
To the lead sections of that of USA, China, Malaysia or heck even Nigeria. They are 3x larger than the current reversion of the lead section. We must standardize the Philippines article. I'm reverting it back to the longer version since it's only protocol. Also, please discuss reversions in the talk page before you implement it, you must listen to the opinion of others. Plus, if you look at the discussions page you will see that there is a consensus over the issue of having such a short lead section. Truly yours. Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Reply: Keeping it simple and avoid using "repetition" in introduction section. Most of the information written in the introduction is already written in the history section. It is just repeating it self and plus it just confuses the reader. And also, the official number of mestizos living inside or out the Philippines is unknown. The minority of mestizos in the philippines are descendance of the original Spanish, Mexican and American settlers who settled in the country during the colonial period. However, modern day mestizos today can be descendance of any foriegn bearer. however the official numbers of all types of mixed blood individuals in the islands are unknown, due to the fact that the Philippine government has not provided any information or sources in regards to a specific ethnic group. Most of these statistics are infact estimates. The Philippines is infact a predominant Indigenous Asian ethnic group. Thank you. AlvarezQz 18:45 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Your penchant for unwarranted reversions will soon cost you...[edit]
Stop reverting subs without talking in the discussions page 1st. You always revert edits without the consensus of the community...
I'm afraid if you keep doing that. We will have to report you to the administration and your wil probably be suspended.
Truly yours, Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- To add, why do you insist on your version of the lead when you haven't even talked with the rest of the editors at the talk page? You still even insist on your edits while even violating WP:MOSTEXT among others. If you keep doing that, you will be blocked from editing as per WP:BLOCK. Xeltran (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Reply: The reason is to avoid using "repetition" of information written in the introduction section. Most of the information in the introduction is already written in the history section. Must keep article simple and easy to read for readers. Thank you. AlvarezQz 18:59 23 January 2009 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Philippines, you will be blocked from editing. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Philippines, you will be blocked from editing. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 01:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Caution![edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Philippines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 01:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 01:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)A note for you![edit]
Greetings! Kindly remember to please italicize words that are not in English. This is according to the policy at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting)#Foreign terms. Thank you. Mk32 (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- And a hang-on: why do you keep on insisting to add the word "English:" before the English translation for the Philippine national anthem? This is the English Wikipedia, we don't need to write that the term is in English. Use WP:MOSTEXT for ref, k? Xeltran (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/$antander, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Mayalld (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Reply: Realy? did i vandalized the Philippine article. I guess not. I have simply improve this article and corrected all the words, sentences and removed all Nuetral Point Of View on article. Do you have evidence to support your statements, or is just one of those Personal Statements all over again. User:AlvarezQz 12:12, March 11 2009 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Clerk note: I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm just informing you that another editor has made an allegation. Mayalld (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)