User talk:Alvin Johnson

November 2016

Hello, I'm Laoris. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Almighty Vice Lord Nation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Laoris (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Johnson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alvin Johnson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Tiny Rascal Gang. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 03:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your message to me indicates that you were attempting to add information which you believe is correct. However, the article has much information that is sourced. If you are going to change any of the information, or add information that is not from a cited source and may not be consistent with the existing text, you need to provide reliable and verifiable sources. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; Help:Footnotes and Wikipedia:Verifiability. You also should provide an explanation of the edits in the edit summary and if necessary for a longer explanation, refer to the talk page in the summary and place the longer explanation on that page. See Help:Introduction to talk pages, Help:Using talk pages and Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. If you are rearranging information, you should mention that in the edit summary so that a reviewer does not read it as unsourced new information.

Other helpful Wikipedia policy, guideline, format, style and help pages include Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:No original research; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Notability; Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; and Wikipedia:Words to watch. See also Wikipedia:Copyright Problems, Wikipedia:Images and Wikipedia:Uploading images for those special topics. Help:Contents and Wikipedia:Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested on various subjects. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Alvin Johnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MB298 (talk) 01:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Norteños. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 03:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rich Chigga. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fresno Bulldogs. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Asian Boyz. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requent

Can I edit the bloods page as thdre no source say 75,000 membersCpaMoneymake00000r (talk) 04:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

M.O.D

You know something about Menace of Destruction? I see you edit a bit here and there recently from the page. 63.247.32.164 (talk) 23:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khmer people, you may be blocked from editing. William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 00:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Folk Nation. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Norteños. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 00:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Black P. Stones (Jungles). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:17, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Realist Dragon Family

Hello Alvin Johnson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Realist Dragon Family for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Side Longos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crazy Brothers Clan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crazy Brothers Clan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of East Side Longos

The article East Side Longos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Unable to find any substantial coverage in reliable sources. A few news reports stating various arrestees/convicts were members, but little else. Several unreliable sources listing every would-be gang have listings, but nothing reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]