User talk:Alwinjoseph716

Your submission at Articles for creation: White Rose Movie (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White Rose Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Alwinjoseph716, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Swapna Treasa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swapna Treasa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Varun Chandran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Varun Chandran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muhammed Ashique Kuruniyan

The article Muhammed Ashique Kuruniyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:White Rose Movie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:White Rose Movie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fanport

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fanport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Joe (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Disha Dinakar

Hello Alwinjoseph716,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Disha Dinakar for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alwinjoseph716 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21301 was submitted on Apr 22, 2018 10:17:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Sir, UTRSBot,SamHolt6, I am unable to find the reason for blocking me from editing and creating articles in Wikipedia, I cannot find the actual reason, I haven't done anything that violated the terms and condition, as you have mentioned that I and the other user account have some connetions. I don't have anything to do with that account. You can check the IP addresses of both our accounts and you can find out that we are not even from same place and i don't have any connection with It. Actually Wikipedia was like everything to me, because i used to work in Wikipedia editing and creating articles with genuine and referable Information's. I was very upset to see that i was blocked. Please review my User account and please unblock it. I am a Digital Marketer and Content Creator in south Indian Film Industry, I used to edit and Create articles related to cinema field and I used only genuine information to fill the articles. Please Review my ID and please Unblock it ' Alwinjoseph716 (talk) 10:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Alwinjoseph716: apologies for the confusion but I am not the one who issued your block. Neither is UTRSBot, which is an automated program. You will have to file a request for unblock with a more appropriate party.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Sir, User:Oshwah, I am unable to find the reason for blocking me from editing and creating articles in Wikipedia, I cannot find the actual reason, I haven't done anything that violated the terms and condition, as you have mentioned that I and the other user account have some connetions. I don't have anything to do with that account. You can check the IP addresses of both our accounts and you can find out that we are not even from same place and i don't have any connection with It. Actually Wikipedia was like everything to me, because i used to work in Wikipedia editing and creating articles with genuine and referable Information's. I was very upset to see that i was blocked. Please review my User account and please unblock it. I am a Digital Marketer and Content Creator in south Indian Film Industry, I used to edit and Create articles related to cinema field and I used only genuine information to fill the articles. Please Review my ID and please Unblock it 'Alwinjoseph716 (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Please see this page for more information regarding the investigation and the block placed on your account. If you have any additional questions, reply here and make sure to ping me in your response so that I get a notification. Otherwise, I won't be notified and hence won't be aware of your messages. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Oshwah sir, I have read the case and i assure you that the account which is said to be mine is not mine and it has to do nothing with my account. You can actually check my and that other accounts IP address so that you will understand that the accounts are not mine and somebody else's. I was asked to create a Wikipedia article based on that actress by a person who is the production controller of some movie she was acting. I had seen that it was previously deleted and i thought it was deleted because of lacking of reference and citation. I was like cheated by the person. I did't knew the article was created before by many peoples.I can still say that the username User:Dilshad002 and my account has no connection with each other. I don't even know who is behind that username. Please do check our IP addresses and you can find about it. Please check and you will find that i was innocent and you may have mistakenly blocked me from editing and creating. I used to create and translate wikipedia articles when i simply sit. Now because i am blocked i feel very lonely and i cannot even edit or create any articles. Please understand my situation. Even if i have done something wrong if the eyes of you, please forgive me and give me a second chance. I won't waste it. Please unblock me from creating and editing wikipedia articles. I will only update and create articles with genuine and exact information's. Kindly please unblock me from wikipedia.Alwinjoseph716 (talk) 10:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:White Rose Movie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:White Rose Movie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Hello Oshwah sir, I have read the case and i assure you that the account which is said to be mine is not mine and it has to do nothing with my account. You can actually check my and that other accounts IP address so that you will understand that the accounts are not mine and somebody else's. I was asked to create a Wikipedia article based on that actress by a person who is the production controller of some movie she was acting. I had seen that it was previously deleted and i thought it was deleted because of lacking of reference and citation. I was like cheated by the person. I did't knew the article was created before by many peoples.I can still say that the username User:Dilshad002 and my account has no connection with each other. I don't even know who is behind that username. Please do check our IP addresses and you can find about it. Please check and you will find that i was innocent and you may have mistakenly blocked me from editing and creating. I used to create and translate wikipedia articles when i simply sit. Now because i am blocked i feel very lonely and i cannot even edit or create any articles. Please understand my situation. Even if i have done something wrong if the eyes of you, please forgive me and give me a second chance. I won't waste it. Please unblock me from creating and editing wikipedia articles. I will only update and create articles with genuine and exact information's. Kindly please unblock me from wikipediaAlwinjoseph716 (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alwinjoseph716 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22053 was submitted on Jul 13, 2018 19:08:40. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Oshwah Sir, I am sorry if i have done anything wrong. But as far as i can see i haven't done any policy violation in Wikipedia. I am a starter in Wikipedia. I have been asked to create a Wikipedia by one of my client, that was Disha Dinakar. I didn't knew that, that Wiki article was blocked from Wikipedia. There is no link or any contact between Joshyvjohn and My account. If you check you can even find out that we are not even from same place. You can find that if u check the IP addresses of both of us. Sir, Wikipedia was a part of mine. I used to work in Wikipedia for around 2 hours daily. Editing and creating articles. Yes i have created articles and some got deleted. I am a digital content manager in south Indian Film industry since my account was blocked from your side i have lost my Job as a content writer. Now i am struggling. It had cost me a lot. Still i can't find the reason for you blocking me. i swear that User:Joshyvjohn is not mine or that person is not at all connected with me a and also Dilshad002. I don't know how you find this match but i swear that Both that accounts have nothing to do with mine. Sir if you can forgive me and give me a second chance. I will perform better that earlier. Please Kindly accept my request User:Oshwah Sir, And I am sorry if i have talked something disrespectfully with you. Kindly remove my block on editing and creating articles. Thank you. Alwinjoseph716 (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

hello Oshwah Sir,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alwinjoseph716 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry if i have done anything wrong. But as far as i can see i haven't done any policy violation in Wikipedia. I am a starter in Wikipedia. I have been asked to create a Wikipedia by one of my client, that was Disha Dinakar. I didn't knew that, that Wiki article was blocked from Wikipedia. There is no link or any contact between Joshyvjohn and My account. If you check you can even find out that we are not even from same place. You can find that if u check the IP addresses of both of us. Sir, Wikipedia was a part of mine. I used to work in Wikipedia for around 2 hours daily. Editing and creating articles. Yes i have created articles and some got deleted. I am a digital content manager in south Indian Film industry since my account was blocked from your side i have lost my Job as a content writer. Now i am struggling. It had cost me a lot. Still i can't find the reason for you blocking me. i swear that User:Joshyvjohn is not mine or that person is not at all connected with me a and also Dilshad002. I don't know how you find this match but i swear that Both that accounts have nothing to do with mine. Sir if you can forgive me and give me a second chance. I will perform better that earlier. Please Kindly accept my request User:Oshwah Sir, And I am sorry if i have talked something disrespectfully with you. Kindly remove my block on editing and creating articles. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Admitted violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. It's likely that the violation of WP:SOCK came about because you were asked to create an article on behalf of someone else. In any case, given your multiple violations here, we definitely shouldn't unblock you. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I will let someone else address the sockpuppetry with you but you seem to be saying that you are a paid editor; if you are you are required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use to comply with WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Sir, 331dot, I am a freelancer. I don't get paid by everyone. I am a starter too. I am usually asked to create articles on whom they want. I only do articles if they are genuine and they have genuine reliable links so that i can cite the article correctly. But i had wished if i was getting paid for the articles. I'm a Digital content manager. Please help me with It. But i will disclose it if someone is paying me. I will update in my user page about it. Till now, i'm not yet got paid by anyone. Thank you. Alwinjoseph716 (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

You stated above "I have been asked to create a Wikipedia by one of my client" and "I am a digital content manager in south Indian Film industry since my account was blocked from your side i have lost my Job as a content writer". That makes you a paid editor and you must comply with WP:PAID. At a minimum, you need to comply with the conflict of interest policy. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)