Jump to content

User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2015/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Weirdness

First see User:Tron Pro of the Universe whom I blocked as VOA. Then see these two editors, both of whom seem to be having the oddest interactions with Tron Pro, each other, and their own edits themselves: User:That Bot with the Third Eye and User:Strike of lightning. I'm assuming they're all connected but I'm not confident enough to block on that basis (the so-called bot account can probably be blocked as VOA, though).--Bbb23 (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

FTR as Ponyo already looked at it:  Confirmed Strike of lightning, That Bot with the Third Eye, Chungdunchun, Jhh ihg ksksk, Insteadly, Tacopoptartburrito, Popholditdwn and Gratata07. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 06:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I was aware of some of the blocks by Ponyo but didn't know there were that many. Would you like me to figure out who is the master and tag?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
From the looks of it they're a few school kids mucking about. Some have created multiple accounts, others are just throwaways. I've blocked their school IP, so this will hopefully put an end to it. If any of them are determined to evade the block we can start looking at tags and whatnot.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Talkback

Hello, AmandaNP. You have new messages at DoRD's talk page.
Message added 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sam Walton (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Recent Behavior

I apologize for my recent actions. At this point, I'll lay low, and not jump to conclusions. I really hate to see that you are disappointed in me as this is my second chance already. I really hope this can change soon and I can get my act together. I think at this point, I'm a little too jumpy and eager to get my hands on things. I appreciate your message very much. Any advice? Eurodyne (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

A simple mistake?

A simple mistake? This editor was blocked for no reason, and no one seems to care. You will let him languish in the chains of bondage for no reason other than whims of a certain person who seems to care for nothing other than his own aggrandisement? Please explain, why was he blocked? WHY? NO RATIONALE WAS PROVIDED. The only rationale provided was "arbitration enforcement", and guess what, it is clear that this wasn't doing that, which is what your motion states. Therefore, please explain, the grounds for a block. Otherwise, I shall to move to remove the committee from office with a motion of no confidence. RGloucester 22:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

If your asking why we haven't gone for a motion to unblock, you've already answered your own question in the first 7 words of your request. Beyond that, i'm not sure what your asking for. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 23:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Are you kidding me? I explained this to NE Ent, as a matter of fact. There was no blockable disruption whatsoever, certainly not to warrant an indefinite block. This is absolutely absurd to highest degree. I've never seen a worse miscarriage in my life. Coffee still has not provided a rationale for his blocking. He has provided no specific edits that he thought warranted a block. His only rationale was "arbitration enforcement", and he wasn't really enforcing anything, because he didn't follow the god-damned procedure. This must be dealt with, and I will file a no confidence motion if the committee allows for this miscarriage on its own watch. RGloucester 23:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
"languish in the chains of bondage" "I've never seen a worse miscarriage in my life" Really? REALLY? It's a freaking online encyclopedia. Regardless of whether your argument has merit, most people stop listening when the hyperbole is ratcheted up to such a ridiculous level.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I beg your pardon? I speak plainly, and with the gravity warranted. For such a travesty to be allowed is a shame that will be branded on all of our heads. RGloucester 00:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Have you read a newspaper lately? You seriously need some perspective. Good day sir.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 01:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Gravity is determined by context, dear fellow. RGloucester 02:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

16:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015