User talk:Ame283

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ame283. Remember to sign any posts on talk pages with the 4 tildes, and also to sign off on every change you make within Wikipedia, in the "edit summary" box at the bottom of the edit window. You'll find good help pages to the left here; and Wikipedia also has an excellent Student_tutorial Ssenier (talk) 01:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tracy Ann DeMeyer.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ame283. You have new messages at Ramaksoud2000's talk page.
Message added 01:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trace DeMeyer[edit]

Hiya -

Sorry for replying late. I've had a look for independent sources that could be used to back up this article and am drawing a complete blank. You might want to take a look at WP:PAPER to get a better handle on why this is a problem - in a nutshell, the need for verifiability prevents people from using Wikipedia as a vanity project. I know that this is mainly a class project, but if you were interested in getting DeMeyer into Wikipedia anyway, I'd suggest pitching articles about her to reasonably respected news outlets, then someone else could use that coverage as a citation.

Best, Vizjim (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS - I wouldn't worry about the number of edits others have done - the person concerned might have retired an old username for all sorts of reasons. WP is a space where it's usually better to "play the ball, not the man." Vizjim (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trace DeMeyer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trace DeMeyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trace DeMeyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]