User talk:American Starkiller

Welcome!

Hello, American Starkiller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jacqueline Bisset, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mass murder. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films based on actual events, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloody Wednesday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

R.E. Lee infobox disruption

Please do not disrupt the Infobox at Robert E. Lee with an unsourced and undiscussed flag such as the Blood Stained Banner.

David Sansing, professor emeritus of history at the University of Mississippi at “Mississippi History Now”, online Mississippi Historical Society observes in his Brief history of Confederate flags, that the BSB was “unlikely” to have flown over “any Confederate troops or civilian agencies”. He quoted the author of “Confederate Military History”, General Bradley T. Johnson, “I never saw this flag, nor have I seen a man who did see it.” -- the BSB.

In contrast, Ellis Merton Coulter in his The Confederate States of America, 1861-1865 viewed June 13, 2012, published in LSU’s History of the South series, on page 118 notes that beginning in March 1861, the First National Flag was used “all over the Confederacy”.

Please discuss any proposed changes in an info box at the article Talk before unsourced disruption in the future. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bullying

Skimming through my contributions, I sometimes click on old articles that I've edited if they're no longer the current version. This is how I found your user page. I saw how passionate you were about bullying and your experiences and I had to write. I agree 100% with what you say, especially the part about people telling you to ignore the bullies. I've been bullied, but I can't say I was ever bullied to the extent you were. I'm sorry you had to deal with that.

You seem to be an opinionated sort of person, with an actual *gasp* personality. I'm glad you survived. Hypnopompus (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Canterbury Tail talk 01:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 15:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Goodluck Jonathan. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. M. Caecilius (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al Capone

Hello, if you wish to add categories to an article, there needs to be reliably sourced information in the body of the article on it first. Could you please add in information on Capone's supposed killings before adding the category? - Hoops gza (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eddie Rickenbacker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. GroveGuy (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of The Emperor's New Groove characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

hearted and well-intentioned. Whenever he faces a moral dilemma, smaller versions of Kronk, his [[shoulder angel|shoulder angel and devil, appear, but they usually bicker and mock one another

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Edward Wahlen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{military person
|branch={{flag|United States Navy]]<br/>{{army|USA}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INFOBOXFLAG

"Flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many". Dont add flags to infoboxes. Murry1975 (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Catherine O'Leary, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi, how are you? i was reading an article and seeing the history i found you user and i read your information. As you can read, i'm not native american, i'm mexican and may be my grammar not 100% perfect, but i really wanted to chat with you because you seem to be a person really nice though the things you had to bear in school years ago. I just wanted to say hi :) Hi :D

--Kar Almaguer (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Granville Henderson Oury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mississippi in the American Civil War. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alex Jones. Even if correct, you may not say that without a reliable source, and I'm not sure you may say that even if there is a reliable source. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 22:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Rubin, you may be interested in this user's block. Drmies (talk) 23:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do what I want. American Starkiller (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Listen up

Listen up you stupid fucks. I do whatever the fuck I want American Starkiller (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No you won't. I'm going to remove access to your talk page. If you ever calm down and you wish to place an unblock request, you can email ArbCom. In the meantime, I'll add a block to your regular account, just in case you wish to continue your disruptive edits, which go against consensus.
And I'll tell you one more thing. "Stupid fuck"--well, stupid is as stupid fucks, I suppose. You've fucked around with the community's patience long enough. But even so, I'm not stupid enough to rollback all your little flag edits, as tempting as it is--especially given your attitude. In fact, I looked at some fifty edits, and saw two or three that are probably helpful, so I won't hit mass rollback. In the course of time, the kindergarten-style flaggies will be taken care of via normal editing. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]