User talk:Americanjewswagger

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Americanjewswagger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roni Duani

I saw your edits to Roni Duani. Thank you for editing! Please always remember to cite a verifiable source when you edit. Also, I would like to point out that just because the artist is often compared to Britney Spears, that does not make Britney Spears an associated act. If you read the usage descriptions on the infobox page you'll see that associated acts include groups of which the artist has been a member, acts that have collaborated, toured together, etc. It specifically states that "groups that are merely similar" should not be listed in this box. Anyway, I've fixed that problem. Thank you for editing, and welcome! Feel free to ask questions on my talk page if you have any, or simply post {{helpme}} on your talk page. GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Hi. The content you add to Wikipedia may be entirely correct, but it will undoubtedly be removed unless it is supported by reliable sources. You are simply wasting your time adding information without sources. Best, --brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yom Kippur War

Hi, your last edit to Yom Kippur War is incorrect - a tactical victory is a military victory. I have reverted it. Please provide edits that are more constructive than this one. AshLin (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Americanjewswagger, In a military conflict infobox adding the world "military" is redundant, all results are assumed to be military. I'm reverting again. If you disagree, please discuss in the talk page of the article for consensus before you change it once again. Happy editing, AshLin (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah hit the talk page. I totally get where you are coming from but we can't keep on reverting over and over again.Cptnono (talk) 05:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2006 Lebanon War. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rami R 15:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]