User talk:Amshamoon

Living Downstream (film)

I would like to know why the page I created, Living Downstream (film) was deleted. The reason you gave was "(notability not asserted)" but that really doesn't tell me anything at all. This listing deserves to be published, so please tell me where I went wrong so I can try again. Thanks. - AMS

Have you read our guidelines on notability? The problem here, if I might interject is that your article doesn't show how the subject meets these guidelines. Please ping me for help if you need more advice Fritzpoll (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Fritzpoll. I did read this. Does it come down to the sources that were used, or the degree to which you can find subjects listed in outside sources which might prove their notability via an "objective source"? There are countless examples where wiki articles reference sources that could be seen as conflictual, so if this is the problem, I am confused. It is frustrating that I am unable to revisit the text from this entry to review and learn. Any feedback would be great. - AMS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.157.35 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Living Downstream (film) was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Smoozle (talk) 04:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Move request

Some time ago, an article in your userspace User:Amshamoon/Living Downstream (film) was tagged with a request to be moved to the live area of Wikipedia. We're sorry that did not get processed until now; such articles did not receive attention.

To rectify this, we have moved your article into the Articles for creation process - where it will be reviewed as soon as possible. It will either be moved to the live area (if acceptable, or if we can fix it up) - or, we will 'decline' the suggestion or place it 'on hold', explaining our reasoning to you.

The article is (for now) in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Living Downstream (film).

You may still edit the article to improve it, if you wish.

We will inform you of the outcome right here, on your user talk page.

If you require any help, at any time, you can either;

• Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
• Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
• Talk to us live, with this or this.--SPhilbrickT 19:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Further to chats

Some useful links?

• WP:CHEATSHEET
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style (film)
• WP:TMM - The Missing Manual

How references work

Simple references These require two parts; a) Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref> b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}"; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Amshamoon/reftest and try it out. Named references Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook"> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/> Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. Citation templates You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} </ref> Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

 Chzz  ►  21:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Living Downstream (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The People's Picture Company was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The People's Picture Company. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  16:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The People's Picture Company concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The People's Picture Company, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission The People's Picture Company

Hello Amshamoon. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The People's Picture Company.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The People's Picture Company}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)