User talk:Anandtmc

Your submission at Articles for creation

Mary P. Verghese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 20:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anandtmc! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women's History, an outreach effort which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of historical topics related to women. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us.

If you're interested, please add your name to our Members page and look at the talk page to find out what we're up to. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thanks!!!

SarahStierch (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Anandtmc, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Verghese may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

with the establishment of the first rehabilitation institute of the country in 1966.<ref>[http://www.cmch-vellore.edu/pdf/introducing%20cmc.pdf Introducing CMC</ref> In recognition of her

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Thank you for your work on updating Cochrane reviews. It's really important and helpful work.

There's a group of editors who like working on medicine-related articles. If you want to come chat with us, then please drop by WT:MED and say hello. It's also a useful place to ask for help if you need it. There's almost always someone who knows how to do just about anything. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You do great work. Thank you :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Anandtmc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Anandtmc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pillai Nila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunanda

Hi Anandtmc, I believe that Sunanda (Singer) should be titled Sunanda (singer) (per WP:PARENDIS) since 'singer' is not a proper noun. Do you have any objections to moving the title? Leschnei (talk) 14:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leschnei, thanks for checking. I agree, the title should be moved as suggested by you. Anandtmc (talk) 00:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Leschnei (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vijay Varadharaj

Hello, Anandtmc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vijay Varadharaj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vijay Varadharaj has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vijay Varadharaj. Thanks! Chumpih ^t 20:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, I had to check after reading this. I see NIE does not seem to be among the list of "reliable sources", but, I'm also not sure why it is not considered reliable. Could you please point me to any such discussion. I've located a couple of other references which I'll add. Anandtmc (talk) 23:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Varadharaj has been accepted

Vijay Varadharaj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 23:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vijay Varadharaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Varadharaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Varadharaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 08:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]