User talk:Ananya S Panicker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anikha seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know the reason?! Ananya S Panicker (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In these edits you added a photo caption "The youngest beauty queen", when there is no photo. Also, we're not interested in your opinion about the subject. Similarly, in this edit you added the statement "She is one of the busiest child artists in the film industry. She is a very much talented girl in acting." First: the film industry is a global industry, so your statement is vague puffery. Second: it is unsourced. Third: that statement would never belong in the lead. Fourth: "talented" is subjective and we're not interested in subjective opinions being presented as though they were facts. Fifth: there are numerous grammatical errors. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rashmika Mandanna. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] This is a neutral encyclopedia, not a fan site. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK understood sir Sorry

Ananya S Panicker (talk) 03:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understood sir[edit]

☺️ Ananya S Panicker (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [2][3]

You also said that you understood the previous warning, so it's unclear why you've continued inserting the problematic content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I m sorry I was very excited Infact that is very true Ananya S Panicker (talk) 04:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And also one more thing. There, are many biased descriptions abt Rashmika but they were not ignored. There are many common people like me & u never accept their edits. This is so bad of Wikipedia. From now on wards I will not edit. I hate wiki now. Sry to have disturbed. I'm gonna delete my account. I don't care abt you😠😠 Ananya S Panicker (talk) 05:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

😠There are many biased descriptions abt Rashmika but. You 0eople will never accept edits from common people like me. This is very bad. & I never expected this from Wikipedia.[edit]

😠😠😠 Ananya S Panicker (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlest have some manners & decency while responding to me[edit]

🙄🙄🙄🙄 Ananya S Panicker (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ananya S Panicker, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Ananya S Panicker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)