User talk:Andilfatokinsi

This is Andilfatokinsi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Andilfatokinsi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Andilfatokinsi/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andilfatokinsi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Historical race concepts, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --WikiLinuz (talk) 07:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, I edited the end of the paragraph just because it mentioned that Races "are among the most damaging elements in the human experience both today and in the past" So Rhetorically if it's something known to be "damaging" in the past and modern world, Why not ban the use of it to reduce or end the damages it caused or will cause in the future. That's just common sense in my opinion. If you don't do anything to stop something known to be hurting, it will continue creating problems for future generations unless you guys are okay with it do it so which I don't mind because it definitely won't be a surprising thing.

Best Regards,

Andil Fatokinsi Andilfatokinsi (talk) 09:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please make yourself acquainted with our guidelines on reliable sources, original research and editorializing. You might also want to improve your English grammar and spelling. Rsk6400 (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]