User talk:Andochine

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Tom.mevlie (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tom.mevlie for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

death to the infidel

whoever that may be

Civility

This edit wins you a brief block. Do not repeat similar behaviour or you will blocked indefinitely. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andochine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey you blokes said it would be a brief block, not till the 21^st, i may be new and wrong, but the 21^st seems a tad extreme if all I did was be incivil.Andochine (talk) 09:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A one-week block is a reasonable one, in my opinion. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What on earth prompted such an abhorrent message? – Luna Santin (talk) 09:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]