Hello, and welcome to my talk page. I will be glad to discuss anything with you. Click here to start a new discussion. I will respond to any and all messages but I will reply here, not on your talk page. Happy editing!
Welcome!
Hello, AndrewJD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Figma 01:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I wanted to find out if you would be able to attend the IRC meeting on Version 0.7 on Sunday evening (6pm British Summer Time). We'll be talking with the publisher, the bot writer and others about plans for the release. If you're not familiar with IRC, I can help you download the software - worthwhile, because most Wikipedia meetings are done on IRC. If you can attend, please sign up here. Thanks! Walkerma 03:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for moving DrFrost's welcome. *smacks head* I didn't even notice I wasn't on the talk page! (Must be past my bedtime!) Ariel♥Gold 20:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]
Glad to help, I've done it myself before a couple of times. AndrewJDTALK -- 20:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Still embarrassing, lol. I know better! Ahh well. Thanks again! Ariel♥Gold 20:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 23:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that your edits were impressive and so I've decided to award you this Original barnstar! Wikidudeman(talk) 23:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Heya Andrew, I was replying to the question on the Help Desk, and had an edit conflict with you, lol. I noticed your reply, and I thought perhaps you were not aware, but IPs are not allowed to comment on RfAs, only those with registered accounts can, and even some new editors are not always considered in the process. Take a look through the RfA instructions to see, but basically it says: "Any Wikipedian with an account is welcome to comment in the Support, Oppose, and Neutral sections. The candidate may respond to the comments of others. Certain comments may be discounted if there are suspicions of fraud; these may be the contributions of very new editors, sockpuppets, and meatpuppets. " Often, brand new editors whose first edits are to RfAs, are discounted, because a normal everyday new editor would have no idea what an RfA is, much less the process, so generally these are SPAs (of course, this is not a rule, nor is it always true, but it is something that editors take into consideration.) I did clarify that in the Help Desk topic, but I thought it would be polite to let you know here as well. Have a wonderful Sunday! Ariel♥Gold 16:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I was clearly mistaken with the IP thing. I do think though that if new editors had a valid comment that was backed up (however unlikely it is to happen) then it would be counted. Perhaps not. Thanks for highlighting this, have an equally wonderful Sunday. AndrewJDTALK -- 16:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Andrew. I've found the e-mail and e-mailed them already. I hope the error would be corrected as soon as possible. Best regards and Merry Christmas to you. --Mbz1 (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
please dont delete this. its my very first article and i just thought that more peoples should know about what a wonderful man my father trevor was...thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smirkycookie (talk • contribs) 22:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, AndrewJD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
