Jump to content

User talk:Andyb215

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Riverside Business and Enterprise College, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Speedy deletion nomination of Louisa Marie[edit]

A tag has been placed on Louisa Marie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tim Ross (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fullhurst Community College. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fullhurst Community College was changed by Andyb215 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-01T10:53:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to JLS. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fullhurst Community College. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for repeated vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This block would have been indefinite, but you have in the past once made a constructive edit. If you vandalise again after this block expires, expect an indefinite block next time. Start with the Welcome page to learn more about how to make useful contributions. JohnCD (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andyb215 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i should be unblocked because i accidentally left my wikipedia account logged in when i swapped computers with a friend at school

Decline reason:

Amazing how many people blame their inappropriate behavior on their friends. Perhaps Wikipedia needs editors with a better class of friends. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andyb215 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i think jpgjordans post was frankly rather rude and i can actually prove if necisary that it was my friend louisa using my account as there were many witnesses in the room at the time and as for the comment about me getting a better class of friends... unfortunately i cant afford to be picky as to who im friends with and i would also like to point out that its most probably against wikipedias policys to label its users as needing a better class of friends

Decline reason:

Josh was perhaps a little too sarcastic, but per WP:GOTHACKED we will have to leave the account blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

well coming to think of it i dont want anything to do with an organisation that treats people as policys and not real people so i will probably not be contributing in the future

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andyb215 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well i thought wikipedia was the kind of organisation that treated people as INDIVIDUALS not "cases" perhaps i was wrong! perhaps wikipedia is another one of those sites that GENERALISES

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what you mean, but you have not provided a legitimate unblock request. Further use of this template to post unrelated messages will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page. TNXMan 12:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andyb215&oldid=1087995546"