User talk:Angeleditormonaco
notability discussion
[edit]The government if Ukraine and the United Kingdom parliament have recognized the work of Civitatis International. If wikipedia editors believe in the five pillars, they should do something to stop the vandalism and removal of verifiable content from this page. 1.Ukrainian Foreign Ministry Statement about the work of Civitatis International.[1] 2. The United Kingdom parliament statement about the work of Civitatis International.[2]
- If you actually added these sources to the article itself, that would be much more helpful. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- The press releases are not considered reliable and they only mention Civitatis, not discuss it in any sort of depth. Not to mention the wall of text your are adding is not supported by either of the so called references. However if you would like to talk about it on the article talk page it would be a better place.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
References
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nucleargeek, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Civitatis International. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a web host
[edit]Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhost. The articles in Wikipedia cover the subject as it has been covered by reliably published third party sources. In the case of CI, the only coverage by third party sources is about the charges for job references, so that is what is in the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit] Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Mcmatter. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]Can you even read? I assume not, since if you could, you would realise that the edits you are making are terrible. A dead rat could understand that Wikipedia needs reliable sources, and after being reverted a few times, that you might actually be wrong. You seem to be the stupidest human being ever. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)