User talk:Angeles Pacheco

This is Angeles Pacheco's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Ricondo (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Juan Ricondo, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Angeles Pacheco/sandbox/Juan Ricondo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Angeles Pacheco/sandbox/Juan Ricondo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 04:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angeles Pacheco! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 04:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Angeles Pacheco. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Ricondo (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Ricondo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juan Ricondo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Angeles Pacheco/sandbox/Juan Ricondo

Hello, Angeles Pacheco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Juan Ricondo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Juan Ricondo

Hello, Angeles Pacheco

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DarkGlow and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Juan Ricondo, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Ricondo.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DarkGlow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DarkGlow (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|DarkGlow}} Hi Dark Glow, thanks for your welcome and thanks for your comments, I find them very useful. I´ve just curated again the article about the singer [[Juan Ricondo]] I´ve been documenting for a while about the artist and I think he fills all the requisites to have an article here. I'm not as good as many of the writers here, like you, so that´s why maybe I´ve made few mistakes in the way I wrote it. Would you be so kind to help me curate this article or perhaps tell me which things I should change?. As I said , I´ve already change some so maybe you can take a look?. Thanks in advance. Angeles--~~~~

Hi Dark Glow, thanks for your welcome and thanks for your comments, I find them very useful. I´ve just curated again the article about the singer Juan Ricondo I´ve been documenting for a while about the artist and I think he fills all the requisites to have an article here. I'm not as good as many of the writers here, like you, so that´s why maybe I´ve made few mistakes in the way I wrote it. Would you be so kind to help me curate this article or perhaps tell me which things I should change?. As I said , I´ve already change some so maybe you can take a look?. Thanks in advance. Angeles --Angeles Pacheco (talk) 09:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dark Glow, thanks for your welcome and thanks for your comments, I find them very useful. I´ve just curated again the article about the singer Juan Ricondo I´ve been documenting for a while about the artist and I think he fills all the requisites to have an article here. I'm not as good as many of the writers here, like you, so that´s why maybe I´ve made few mistakes in the way I wrote it. Would you be so kind to help me curate this article or perhaps tell me which things I should change?. As I said , I´ve already change some so maybe you can take a look?. Thanks in advance. Angeles --Angeles Pacheco Angeles Pacheco (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review the music related notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Angeles Pacheco/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Angeles Pacheco/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]