User talk:Angelgirl1992

Angelgirl1992, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi Angelgirl1992!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Brothers (2015 film). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at ABCD 2. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Brival[edit]

--LeiaWriter (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Respected Sir/Mam, I am working on the references please dont delete the page. Thank You. Can you guite me for writing a better article. THank You[reply]

The article is listed for Article for deletion, as it is clearly not notable, no notable coverage, if you have any issue you can give your suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Brival. Angelgirl1992 (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help[edit]

Can You please tell me what I can do to stop deletion of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeiaWriter (talk • contribs) 21:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angelgirl1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I have been blocked, what did I do wrong?? This is my only account I don't have any else, there must have been misunderstanding.

Decline reason:

Abused sockpuppets. Max Semenik (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.