User talk:Angellis123

Luke Wright

Can you stop changing his bowling style, the sources list him as Medium and as verifiability is one of the key Wikipedia policies that's what we go with. If you want Wikipedia to say Fast-medium rather than getting involved in an edit war I suggest you email Cricinfo/CricketArchive asking them to review his pace. --Jpeeling (talk) 17:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Luke Wright. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jpeeling (talk) 09:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Luke Wright. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. For the upteenth time the main sources (Cricinfo and CricketArchive) say medium, and that's what we go with. I have tried explaining this before and you've ignored me so there's no option but to issue you with a final warning. --Jpeeling (talk | contribs) 11:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Vote in WP:CRIC

There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks --ashwinikalantri ^talk 06:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)