User talk:Angra

Welcome!

Hello, Angra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

Luna Santin 10:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks for the welcome

Of course. Probably not tonight, but I may have time for that tommorow. A quick glance tells me that some editing will probably be needed, but in terms of the usual "new user"-type pages, they look pretty good. :) Alternately, you could post at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback in the event that I take too long for your tastes. Luna Santin 09:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ncl cap logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ncl cap logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Orionlogo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Orionlogo2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Truscott Sign.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Truscott Sign.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 11:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Truscott Sign 01.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Truscott Sign 01.JPG. The copy called Image:Truscott Sign 01.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Liberator Remains 01.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Liberator Remains 01.JPG. The copy called Image:Liberator Remains 01.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Liberator Remains 02.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Liberator Remains 02.JPG. The copy called Image:Liberator Remains 02.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 13:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Vanuatu Police Boat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vanuatu Police Boat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific class patrol boat photos

Thanks for uploading those excellent photos! Nick-D (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Department of Defence images are non-free (eg, as Defence claims copyright over them) and can only used when 'fair use' can be claimed. There's lots of information on this at Wikipedia:Non-free content and File:ADF Commanders 2008 fair use claimed.jpg is an example of a Defence image on which fair use has been claimed. Nick-D (talk) 06:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - the conditions are fairly restrictive, and it's hard to justify using Defence photos unfortunetly. Nick-D (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Material added to the 11th Brigade (Australia) from the Brigade's website

Your recent addition to 11th Brigade (Australia) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:11 Brigade Insignia.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:11 Brigade Insignia.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 03:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been listed as a copyright vio: "The artwork in this image was produced by the Australian Department of Defence and is therefore copyright by the Commonwealth of Australia. Modifications by the user are restricted to file format/resolution, etc and creation of a transparent background - this is insufficient to alter copyright ownership. Badge design is out of copyright but is subject to restriction as an official goverment symbol. Licence tag as UK Govt PD is entirely inappropriate as this is not a UK image. A fair use rationale could reasonably be employed for its appropriate use when uploaded directly to Wikipedia." It is not the badge design that is in issue, but the actual artwork used which is much more recent in origin, no problems with it being loaded to Wikipedia with a fair use rationale. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 09:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article St Augustine's College, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The material you added about priests at St Augustine's College was extremely controversial, and while it included sources, the sources were definitely not strong enough to support allegations that strong. Wikipedia's policy on biographical material about living persons requires extremely solid sourcing for any kind of contentious claims, so some of this had to be removed. If there are more reliable sources available to confirm these claims (e.g. reports from mainstream news organizations) then the material can be added back to the article. —Tim Pierce (talk) 01:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:OrionCruisesSarinaBratton.jpg

The file File:OrionCruisesSarinaBratton.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, future use unlikely, questionable if own work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]