User talk:Angrykitty

Welcome!

Hello, Angrykitty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Yuna Kim does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sandro Viletta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 18:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sui Wenjing

Hello Angrykitty,

You added the following to this article:

"In the individual competition, a spectacular short program which set a new short program world record put them in the lead going into the pairs free skate. Two minor mistakes in the long would cost them the gold medal though as Savchenko/Massot came from behind with a spectacular program to win by less than half a point, leaving Sui/Han with an Olympic silver medal."

There are two major problems with this edit. First of all, it is unreferenced, so it fails our policy on Verifiability. You must include references that support all substantive claims you add to an article. Secondly, it includes the evaluative, non-neutral word "spectacular" twice, which violates our policy requiring the neutral point of view. You cannot call anything "spectacular" in Wikipedia's voice, although you can quote a recognized skating expert using that word. Compliance with such basic policies is essential if you want to keep editing Wikipedia. Please study these policies and comply with them. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]