User talk:Angus.deerhound

Image tagging for Image:Sm angus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sm angus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "John Bishop's Britain"

A page you created, John Bishop's Britain, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to The Sugarcubes

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to The Sugarcubes. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you! ƬheStrike Σagle 17:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red Frame/White Light

Please stop using Red Frame/White Light to promote a personal agenda. 2A02:C7F:8E0C:6600:402D:37FF:21B1:F840 (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red Frame/White Light. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]