User talk:Anil Singh Pokhriyal

Anyone who is trying to remove my reference on Ayurveda. Please read this

Answer These Questions:

1.) Do you have knowledge of Ayurveda?

2.) Can you read Hindi?

3.) Do you know anyone in India, who can verify if the author is noticable or not?

If none of them is yes, then how can you verify that he is a notable person or not. Before marking as spam research thoroughly on Rajiv Dixit and Ramdev. You can contact someone in India to see the significance of him.

Don't remove something unless you can't prove its not significant.

ThanksAnil Singh Pokhriyal (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anil_Singh_Pokhriyal reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about your editing[edit]

Not only is there an active report against you for edit warring, but you've just deleted the references section from the Rajiv Dixit article. What explanation can you offer for that edit? —C.Fred (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take a deep look before commenting what I did, I accidently added the reference in Hindi which I was adding somewhere else then after realizing that I removed it. I don't know why you guys don't treat us well.Anil Singh Pokhriyal (talk) 21:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

To be clear, this block has nothing to do with whether the book should be mentioned in the Ayurveda article. What this block does mean is that repeatedly adding it to the article is not an acceptable way to resolve the dispute; you must discuss the inclusion at the talk page and only include it once there is consensus to do so. —C.Fred (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anil Singh Pokhriyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I shared a link with you where you can download some books on health which are based on Ayurveda and written by well known author in India. Once India gave the wealth of information to world the world and now we can't even edit page on Ayurveda. Please tell me why you blocked me? Anil Singh Pokhriyal (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for violation of the three revert rule. You made five reverts to the Ayurveda article within a 24-hour period, and made the last revert after you were warned repeatedly against violating the rule. —C.Fred (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]