User talk:Animall

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cardio First Angel (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Animall/Cardio First Angel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Animall, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you had posted at Roger Dodger's page, and this person asked me to comment because I am from WikiProject Medicine. The major problem with the article is that it does not cite any source which is independent of the stakeholders of the success of the product. Currently, the sources mentioned in the article are the product's own marketing page and the manufacturer themselves. For this article to go live, identify 2-3 sources which were not published by people who have a financial stake in the product's success. Take information from those, cite the sources, then re-submit.

When making any health claim, it is expected that sources cited will comply with the guideline at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). I hope you understand that the guidelines are in place to maintain quality here. Let me know if you need assistance on-wiki. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Animall. You have new messages at Bluerasberry's talk page.
Message added 14:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your initial article

Hiya @Animall: Thank you for the invite to take a look at your initial start-to-finish article which was - as you see above - not accepted and several people explaining carefully why. In the time I've been around the project, I've seen dozens of new contributors start just as you did - write about something close and personal - get shot down and then turn around and realize that the gift of Wikipedia is not writing about one's own self, but about the great and interesting world around us.

For example, if you google my name, you'll find I have quite a few publications - mostly in herpetology. How many articles about frogs, toads, lizards, snakes, caecilians or crocodiles have I edited .... Zero. I consider it a conflict to edit within the sphere in which I'm one of the published authorities and I'm leaving it to people who don't have a pile of titles on the shelf to contribute to wiki because it is through their winnowing and learning that knowledge comes flowing out.

Please take some time and observe other articles. One of the best places, IMHO to observe WikiQuality at work is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Current_nominations where you can read all sorts of interesting new articles and see experienced editor comments on what works and what doesn't work. After at least a week of really looking at that process, go back and take a look at your suggestion - and I think you'll see everything a lot clearer. Again, please don't hesitate to leave me messages, but try to do it here or on my talk page?? I'm an admin at Commons, but not here and can't do more than offer advice... which is read a lot first... look at all those funny little numbers after practically every sentence and how they lead to reliable secondary sources... observe the neutral point of view in articles, no fanboi and no cheerleaders here... and then see that each article is edited and reedited to the point where there's no "mine" anymore, merely "the articles." Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Animall. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Welcome

Hello, Animall, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Thank you Ellin,

I appreciate your posting of these links

Cheers

Animall

Your draft article, User:Animall/Cardio First Angel

Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cardio First Angel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cardio First Angel concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cardio First Angel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cardio First Angel

Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cardio First Angel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Cardio First Angel, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment they left was:

Neither draft has enough references to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Animall/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cardio First Angel

My comment at User talk:Onel5969 was in a different thread and not a reply to your comment. That's why I had a header noting it was a different topic. Sorry if that caused confusion. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cardio First Angel

Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cardio First Angel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]